20150930 TZHC Arusha

20150930 TZHC Arusha

The application is incompetent and struck out because neither the notice of motion nor the supporting affidavit stated the grounds for the relief sought, a mandatory requirement under Rule 48(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Citation
20150930 TZHC Arusha
Parties
Applicant: Ayubu Bendera and 10 Others; Respondent: A.I.C.C. Arusha
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 September 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Preliminary Objection, Notice of Motion Requirements
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ayubu Bendera and 10 Others

Applicant

A.I.C.C. Arusha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the application is incompetent for failure to state grounds for relief in the notice of motion or affidavit
  2. 2 Whether failure to serve documents or file written submissions is a pure point of law for preliminary objection

Ratio Decidendi

The application is incompetent and struck out because neither the notice of motion nor the supporting affidavit stated the grounds for the relief sought, a mandatory requirement under Rule 48(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Application is struck out for failure to state grounds for relief in the notice of motion or affidavit.