20070312 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appellants were properly served both by ordinary and substituted service but failed to file their Written Statement of Defence. There was no ex parte hearing, and the judgment was properly entered under the Civil Procedure Code. Without an appeal or application to set aside the judgment, the application for stay of execution had no basis and was rightly dismissed.
- Citation
- 20070312 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: B. C. Matunda and Co. Ltd; Respondent: A. K. Mujulizi; Respondent: M. Ndanshau
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Service of Process, Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B. C. Matunda and Co. Ltd
Appellant
A. K. Mujulizi
Respondent
M. Ndanshau
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial magistrate erred in dismissing the application for stay of execution
- 2 Whether the appellants were properly served and thus bound by the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants were properly served both by ordinary and substituted service but failed to file their Written Statement of Defence. There was no ex parte hearing, and the judgment was properly entered under the Civil Procedure Code. Without an appeal or application to set aside the judgment, the application for stay of execution had no basis and was rightly dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment