babati saccos ltd and another vs reginald sanka 2020 tzhc 4589 14 december 2020
The attachment of the respondent's house, which was not pledged as collateral, does not fall within the business of the cooperative society as defined by Regulation 83(1), thus the land Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the matter. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
- Citation
- babati saccos ltd and another vs reginald sanka 2020 tzhc 4589 14 december 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Babati SACCOS Ltd; Appellant: Tanfil Consultant (E.A) Ltd; Respondent: Reginald Sanka
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Res Judicata, Trespass, Cooperative Society Dispute Resolution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Babati SACCOS Ltd
Appellant
Tanfil Consultant (E.A) Ltd
Appellant
Reginald Sanka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain the application given Regulation 83(1) of the Cooperative Societies Regulations, 2015
- 2 Whether the application was barred by res judicata
- 3 Whether the trial Tribunal erred in departing from the High Court's previous decision
Ratio Decidendi
The attachment of the respondent's house, which was not pledged as collateral, does not fall within the business of the cooperative society as defined by Regulation 83(1), thus the land Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the matter. The appeal lacks merit and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The suit to proceed on merits before the trial Tribunal.
- Costs to abide with the events.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment