backbone tanzania coltd vs idrisa kachapa others 2021 tzhcld 2111 4 march 2021

backbone tanzania coltd vs idrisa kachapa others 2021 tzhcld 2111 4 march 2021

Applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay, relying solely on alleged illegality which was not apparent on the face of the record and required elaborate argument. No explanation was given for the five-month delay, and the applicant failed to account for each day of delay as required by law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
backbone tanzania coltd vs idrisa kachapa others 2021 tzhcld 2111 4 march 2021
Parties
Applicant: Backbone Tanzania Company Ltd; Respondents: Idrisa Kachepa & 48 Others
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application (labour) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of merit.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitral Award, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Delay and Diligence
Source Language
english
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitral Award Illegality as Ground for Extension Delay and Diligence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Backbone Tanzania Company Ltd

Applicant

Idrisa Kachepa & 48 Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application (labour) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant adduced sufficient cause for delay to warrant extension of time to file revision against CMA award

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay, relying solely on alleged illegality which was not apparent on the face of the record and required elaborate argument. No explanation was given for the five-month delay, and the applicant failed to account for each day of delay as required by law.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of merit.