morekazi construction company ltd vs backlite media ltd 2022 tzhccomd 185 18 july 2022
- Citation
- morekazi construction company ltd vs backlite media ltd 2022 tzhccomd 185 18 july 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 18 July 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Cause (voluntary Winding Up Petition) / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Decision
- 18 July 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Cause (voluntary Winding Up Petition) / Consent Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the Deed of Settlement executed by the parties was enforceable and that the petition was wholly adjusted by the settlement, warranting the abandonment of the preliminary objection and marking the petition as settled on the terms of the Deed of Settlement.
Court disposition
Petition settled by consent; notice of preliminary objection abandoned.
Orders
- The Notice of Preliminary Objection filed in this Court is hereby marked abandoned at the instance of the Respondent.
- The current petition is marked 'Settled at the Consent of the Parties on the basis of terms contained in their duly signed Deed of Settlement, which shall constitute the Decree/Order of this Court'.
02
Material facts
Parties
Morekazi Construction Company Ltd
Petitioner Counsel: Mr Rabin Mafuru MuyenjwaBacklite Media Limited
Respondent Counsel: Ms Prisca Chongero and Emmanuel Ngwabi03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Cause (voluntary Winding Up Petition) / Consent Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the petition for voluntary winding up should be settled based on the parties' Deed of Settlement
- 02
Whether the notice of preliminary objection should be abandoned
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The petitioner sought voluntary winding up of the respondent company under section 281 of the Companies Act and requested the court to record the Deed of Settlement as judgment and decree.
- Respondent
- The respondent initially raised a preliminary objection but later agreed to settle the matter through a Deed of Settlement and prayed to abandon the preliminary objection.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General principles of civil procedure and settlement under the Companies Act
A court may record a settlement reached by parties as a judgment and decree if it meets the requirements of an enforceable deed.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the Deed of Settlement executed by the parties was enforceable and that the petition was wholly adjusted by the settlement, warranting the abandonment of the preliminary objection and marking the petition as settled on the terms of the Deed of Settlement.
Court disposition
Petition settled by consent; notice of preliminary objection abandoned.
- The Notice of Preliminary Objection filed in this Court is hereby marked abandoned at the instance of the Respondent.
- The current petition is marked 'Settled at the Consent of the Parties on the basis of terms contained in their duly signed Deed of Settlement, which shall constitute the Decree/Order of this Court'.
Source and reliance status
TZHCCOMD · 18 July 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHCCOMD
Judgment· 18 July 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO. 21 OF 2022
IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF VOLUNTARY WINDING UP OF
BACKLITE MEDIA LIMITED BY MOREKAZI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD........ PETITION
X
VERSUS BACKLITE MEDIA LIMITED....................... y/ .....RESPONDENT Last order: 14th July,. 2022 X' / ’ Judgment: 18th July, 2022 „ - ''
CONSENT JUDGEMENT ''"x NANGELA, J. // ,/ This petition was/preferred by the Petitioner under section 281 of the Companies Act, Cap<212 R.E 2002. The grounds for it were disclosed in Form No. 281a filed in this Court on the 1st of •■"'s X July 2022. The Petitioner enjoyed the services of Mr Rabin Mafuru Muyenjwa, learned advocate while Ms Prisca Chongero and Emmanuel /1 > i ' Ngvtfabi, learned advocates appeared for the Respondent. The Respondent had filed a notice of preliminary objection but before the hearing of the preliminary objections raised by the Respondent, the parties embarked on settlement negotiations which successfully ended up with the filing of a Deed of Settlement on the 14th day of July 2022. Page 1 of 2 Subsequently, on the 14th day of July 2022, the parties appeared before this Court and informed the Court about the Deed of Settlement which they had executed and filed in this Court. Besides, given the progress made by the parties, the Respondent prayed to abandon the notice of preliminary objections and Mr Rabin urged this Court to record the Parties' Deed of Settlement as forming the Judgment and Decree of the Court. I have examined the Parties' Deed of Settlement fil’eel in this Court on 14th of July 2022. I am satisfied that the<same meets the requirements of an enforceable Deed. Consequently, the parties have, by their Deed of Settlement, wholly adjusted
this petition. With that in mind, this Court hereby proceeds and records the Deed of Settlement and settles for the following orders: 1. That, the Notice of Preliminary Objection filed \ in this Court is hereby marked abandoned at the instance of the // ' Respondent. \ 2. The current petition is marked "Settled at the Consent of the Parties on the basis of *• terms contained in their duly signed Deed of ? Settlement, which shall constitute the Decree/Order of this Court". It is so ordered. DAR-ES-SALAAM, this 18th JULY 2022 HON. DEO JOHN NANGELA
JUDGE Page 2 of 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.