bahati john nyaronga vs others vs george john nyaronga 2013 tzca 316 25 june 2013

bahati john nyaronga vs others vs george john nyaronga 2013 tzca 316 25 june 2013

Failure to annex copies of the proceedings and decision sought to be revised is a fatal omission that renders the application incompetent and liable to be struck out.

Citation
bahati john nyaronga vs others vs george john nyaronga 2013 tzca 316 25 june 2013
Parties
Applicant: Bahati John Nyaronga; Applicant: Anna John Nyaronga; Applicant: Dennis Orego John Nyaronga; Applicant: Emmanuel John Nyaronga; Respondent: George John Nyaronga
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
25 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Hearing of Application Before the Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Revision, Appellate Practice, Probate
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Revision Appellate Practice Probate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bahati John Nyaronga

Applicant

Anna John Nyaronga

Applicant

Dennis Orego John Nyaronga

Applicant

Emmanuel John Nyaronga

Applicant

George John Nyaronga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Revision / Hearing of Application Before the Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an application for revision under section 4(3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act is competent without annexing copies of the proceedings and decision sought to be revised

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to annex copies of the proceedings and decision sought to be revised is a fatal omission that renders the application incompetent and liable to be struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Application struck out
  • No order as to costs