Bakari Juma v Republic

Bakari Juma v Republic

The applicant failed to prove good cause for delay and did not establish any illegality in the tribunal proceedings that would justify extension of time. The claims of illness were unsubstantiated, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not amount to illegality.

Citation
Bakari Juma v Republic
Parties
Applicant: Bakari Juma; Respondent: Mwinda Ramadhani
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Proof of Good Cause
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bakari Juma

Applicant

Mwinda Ramadhani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Revision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for revision
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in the tribunal proceedings justified extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to prove good cause for delay and did not establish any illegality in the tribunal proceedings that would justify extension of time. The claims of illness were unsubstantiated, and the alleged procedural irregularities did not amount to illegality.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to apply for revision is dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs