bakari salum 9 others vs prakash bagwanji jiwani 4 others 2023 tzhclandd 16409 25 april 2023

bakari salum 9 others vs prakash bagwanji jiwani 4 others 2023 tzhclandd 16409 25 april 2023

The applicants demonstrated arguable grounds that merit consideration by the Court of Appeal, thus satisfying the threshold for grant of leave to appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
bakari salum 9 others vs prakash bagwanji jiwani 4 others 2023 tzhclandd 16409 25 april 2023
Parties
Applicant: Bakari Salum; Applicant: Seifu H. Chambuso; Applicant: Salma Salum Mtawa; Applicant: Maua Seif; Applicant: Juma Chambuso; Applicant: Mary John; Applicant: Rose Shirima; Applicant: Judith M. Chuma; Applicant: Sara Laurenti; Applicant: Sikudhani Anzingari; Respondent: Prakash Bagwanji Jiwani; Respondent: Pravin Bagwanji Jiwani; Respondent: Dipesh Bagwanji Jiwani; Respondent: James Juma; Respondent: Majaliwa Rashidi
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
25 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Joinder of Parties, Ownership of Land, Bona Fide Purchaser
Source Language
en
Land Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Joinder of Parties Ownership of Land Bona Fide Purchaser

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bakari Salum

Applicant

Seifu H. Chambuso

Applicant

Salma Salum Mtawa

Applicant

Maua Seif

Applicant

Juma Chambuso

Applicant

Mary John

Applicant

Rose Shirima

Applicant

Judith M. Chuma

Applicant

Sara Laurenti

Applicant

Sikudhani Anzingari

Applicant

Prakash Bagwanji Jiwani

Respondent

Pravin Bagwanji Jiwani

Respondent

Dipesh Bagwanji Jiwani

Respondent

James Juma

Respondent

Majaliwa Rashidi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the application demonstrates sufficient ground for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal
  2. 2 Whether failure to join the vendor as a necessary party was fatal
  3. 3 Whether it was proper for the Court to hold that the respondents' ownership commenced in 2010 instead of 2016

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants demonstrated arguable grounds that merit consideration by the Court of Appeal, thus satisfying the threshold for grant of leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicants granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania
  • Costs to be in the cause