bakari seif msongoro vs mwajuma sultan mtiege 2020 tzhclandd 144 29 may 2020

bakari seif msongoro vs mwajuma sultan mtiege 2020 tzhclandd 144 29 may 2020

The applicant established sufficient cause for delay due to substantiated illness and late receipt of judgment copy, and the respondent did not rebut these facts. The application was filed within a reasonable time after recovery.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
bakari seif msongoro vs mwajuma sultan mtiege 2020 tzhclandd 144 29 may 2020
Parties
Applicant: Bakari Seif Msongoro; Respondent: Mwajuma Sultan Mtiege
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application granted with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
english
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Limitation of Actions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bakari Seif Msongoro

Applicant

Mwajuma Sultan Mtiege

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown to warrant extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether sickness and delay in obtaining judgment copy constitute sufficient cause

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established sufficient cause for delay due to substantiated illness and late receipt of judgment copy, and the respondent did not rebut these facts. The application was filed within a reasonable time after recovery.

Court Disposition

Application granted with costs

Orders

  • Applicant to file intended appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of this ruling