bank of baroda t ltd and another vs pulses and agro commodities t ltd 2016 tzca 32 18 october 2016

bank of baroda t ltd and another vs pulses and agro commodities t ltd 2016 tzca 32 18 october 2016

The appeal was struck out for incompetence due to the incomplete record of appeal, which contravened Rule 96(1)(d) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
bank of baroda t ltd and another vs pulses and agro commodities t ltd 2016 tzca 32 18 october 2016
Parties
Appellant: Bank of Baroda (T) Ltd; Appellant: Mr. Charles Rwechungura - Receiver/Manager; Respondent: Pulses and Agro Commodities (T) Ltd
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Hearing
Outcome
appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Incomplete Record of Appeal, Striking Out Appeal, Court Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Incomplete Record of Appeal Striking Out Appeal Court Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Baroda (T) Ltd

Appellant

Mr. Charles Rwechungura - Receiver/Manager

Appellant

Pulses and Agro Commodities (T) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is competent given the incomplete record of appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was struck out for incompetence due to the incomplete record of appeal, which contravened Rule 96(1)(d) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out

Orders

  • appeal struck out for incompetence
  • no order as to costs