bank of baroda t ltd vs triangle t ltd hawa hamis ngumbi adminitrix of estate of the late ramadhani hamis 3 others 2023 tzhccomd 189 10 march 2023

bank of baroda t ltd vs triangle t ltd hawa hamis ngumbi adminitrix of estate of the late ramadhani hamis 3 others 2023 tzhccomd 189 10 march 2023

The court held that the deed of settlement signed by all parties was mutually consented to, satisfied the requirements of the law, and thus was adopted as the judgment and decree of the court, marking the suit as settled on the agreed terms.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
bank of baroda t ltd vs triangle t ltd hawa hamis ngumbi adminitrix of estate of the late ramadhani hamis 3 others 2023 tzhccomd 189 10 march 2023
Parties
Plaintiff: Bank of Baroda (Tanzania) Limited; 1st Defendant: Triangle Tanzania Limited; 2nd Defendant: Hawa Hamis Ng'umbi (administratrix of estate of the late Ramadhan Hamis); 3rd Defendant: Agrey Frederick Mbuyta; 4th Defendant: Zakaria Kitule
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
10 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Consent Judgment
Outcome
suit settled by consent judgment
Legal Topics
Loan Default, Mortgage Enforcement, Guarantee Liability, Deed of Settlement, Consent Judgment
Source Language
en
Banking Law Contract Law Secured Transactions Loan Default Mortgage Enforcement Guarantee Liability Deed of Settlement Consent Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank of Baroda (Tanzania) Limited

Plaintiff

Triangle Tanzania Limited

1st Defendant

Hawa Hamis Ng'umbi (administratrix of estate of the late Ramadhan Hamis)

2nd Defendant

Agrey Frederick Mbuyta

3rd Defendant

Zakaria Kitule

4th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st defendant breached the facility agreement
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th defendants breached their guarantees
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to enforce the mortgage and debenture

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the deed of settlement signed by all parties was mutually consented to, satisfied the requirements of the law, and thus was adopted as the judgment and decree of the court, marking the suit as settled on the agreed terms.

Court Disposition

suit settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • The amount due to the plaintiff is TZS 1,721,006,122.05.
  • Defendants allowed to sell the mortgaged property through the 4th defendant and all conveyancing to be done through the plaintiff bank.