bakir israel vs republic 2012 tzca 146 28 september 2012

bakir israel vs republic 2012 tzca 146 28 september 2012

The applicant failed to show good cause for extension of time as the reasons advanced were either unsupported, insufficient, or not recognized by law, and the intended review did not rely on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1).

Citation
bakir israel vs republic 2012 tzca 146 28 september 2012
Parties
Applicant: Bariki Isra El; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Good Cause Requirement
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Good Cause Requirement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bariki Isra El

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file an application for review under Rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show good cause for extension of time as the reasons advanced were either unsupported, insufficient, or not recognized by law, and the intended review did not rely on any of the grounds under Rule 66(1).

Court Disposition

dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.