barutwayo zahaki vs republic 2018 tzca 600 29 august 2018
Failure to swear the interpreter before interpreting proceedings to the accused, who did not understand the language of the court, was a fatal procedural irregularity that rendered the entire trial a nullity, leaving no admissible evidence to support conviction.
- Citation
- barutwayo zahaki vs republic 2018 tzca 600 29 august 2018
- Parties
- Appellant: Barutwayo Zahaki; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Unlawful Entry, Fair Trial, Right to Interpretation, Judicial Oaths, Succession of Magistrates
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barutwayo Zahaki
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to swear the interpreter rendered the trial a nullity
- 2 Whether noncompliance with section 214(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding succession of magistrates prejudiced the appellant
- 3 Whether lack of proof of the victim's age affected the propriety of retrial
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to swear the interpreter before interpreting proceedings to the accused, who did not understand the language of the court, was a fatal procedural irregularity that rendered the entire trial a nullity, leaving no admissible evidence to support conviction.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of both courts below quashed
- Sentences set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment