bashirfu salum sudi vs republic 2019 tzca 531 1 april 2019

bashirfu salum sudi vs republic 2019 tzca 531 1 april 2019

The conviction was sustained because the evidence of the victim (PW1) was properly received on affirmation, was credible, and sufficiently proved all elements of the offence. Corroboration was not legally required, and oral evidence sufficed for age and medical findings despite expungement of documentary exhibits.

Citation
bashirfu salum sudi vs republic 2019 tzca 531 1 april 2019
Parties
Appellant: Bashiru Salum Sudi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Evidence of Child Witnesses, Corroboration, Procedure for Admission of Exhibits
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Rape Evidence of Child Witnesses Corroboration Procedure for Admission of Exhibits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bashiru Salum Sudi

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was proper given the manner of receiving evidence from child witnesses
  2. 2 Whether corroboration was required for the evidence of the victim
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was sustained because the evidence of the victim (PW1) was properly received on affirmation, was credible, and sufficiently proved all elements of the offence. Corroboration was not legally required, and oral evidence sufficed for age and medical findings despite expungement of documentary exhibits.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed