batromeo moka vs hancoud salehe 11 others 2023 tzhc 21097 19 september 2023

batromeo moka vs hancoud salehe 11 others 2023 tzhc 21097 19 september 2023

Applicant failed to account for delay as evidence of sickness was rebutted by respondents and not explained or opposed; therefore, no good cause shown.

Citation
batromeo moka vs hancoud salehe 11 others 2023 tzhc 21097 19 september 2023
Parties
Applicant: Batromeo Moka; Respondent: Hancoud Salehe; Respondent: Salvatory Chandalala; Respondent: Frolence Nwananzuni; Respondent: Fransus Mbaruku; Respondent: Charles Mwanalinze; Respondent: Stelaton Chavunike; Respondent: Anselmo Kanoni; Respondent: Noelia Kasomo; Respondent: Joseph Mahala; Respondent: Charles Ngula; Respondent: Frola Herman; Respondent: Samwel Kalunde
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Good Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Good Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Batromeo Moka

Applicant

Hancoud Salehe

Respondent

Salvatory Chandalala

Respondent

Frolence Nwananzuni

Respondent

Fransus Mbaruku

Respondent

Charles Mwanalinze

Respondent

Stelaton Chavunike

Respondent

Anselmo Kanoni

Respondent

Noelia Kasomo

Respondent

Joseph Mahala

Respondent

Charles Ngula

Respondent

Frola Herman

Respondent

Samwel Kalunde

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for delay as evidence of sickness was rebutted by respondents and not explained or opposed; therefore, no good cause shown.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • application dismissed
  • costs awarded to respondents