2001215 TZHC Mwanza
Application for revision is legally competent and properly filed under section 44(1)(b) MCA, 1984, especially where the time for setting aside the ex parte judgment has expired.
- Citation
- 2001215 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Applicant: Beker Pride Ltd; Respondent: Alphonce Paul
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Revision / Preliminary Ruling on Competence of Application
- Outcome
- Application for revision is ruled competent and will proceed to hearing on merits.
- Legal Topics
- Revision of Ex Parte Judgment, Jurisdiction, Procedural Competence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Parties
Beker Pride Ltd
Applicant
Alphonce Paul
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision / Preliminary Ruling on Competence of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an application for revision of an ex parte judgment is properly filed instead of an application to set aside the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
Application for revision is legally competent and properly filed under section 44(1)(b) MCA, 1984, especially where the time for setting aside the ex parte judgment has expired.
Court Disposition
Application for revision is ruled competent and will proceed to hearing on merits.
Orders
- Revision application to proceed to hearing as filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment