MISC LAND CASE 28414 Minja

MISC LAND CASE 28414 Minja

The applicant failed to specify the alleged illegalities and did not provide sufficient cause for the delay; the claim that no other remedy was available was unfounded as the applicant had already pursued objection proceedings and could file a new suit.

Citation
MISC LAND CASE 28414 Minja
Parties
Applicant: Benard Gustavu Minja; 1st Respondent: Twalha Moshi Amri; 2nd Respondent: Joel Matotai; 3rd Respondent: Gabriel Tango
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Limitation of Actions, Sufficient Cause, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Limitation of Actions Sufficient Cause Illegality as Ground for Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benard Gustavu Minja

Applicant

Twalha Moshi Amri

1st Respondent

Joel Matotai

2nd Respondent

Gabriel Tango

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for revision out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to specify the alleged illegalities and did not provide sufficient cause for the delay; the claim that no other remedy was available was unfounded as the applicant had already pursued objection proceedings and could file a new suit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs