benedict kilembe vs republic 2016 tzca 285 18 april 2016

benedict kilembe vs republic 2016 tzca 285 18 april 2016

Reference to a non-existent judgment date in the notice of motion is a fatal defect rendering the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.

Citation
benedict kilembe vs republic 2016 tzca 285 18 april 2016
Parties
Applicant: Benedict Kilembe; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 April 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Preliminary Objection, Defective Application, Citation of Law
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benedict Kilembe

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether failure to cite Rule 48(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules renders the application defective
  2. 2 Whether reference to a non-existent judgment date renders the application incompetent

Ratio Decidendi

Reference to a non-existent judgment date in the notice of motion is a fatal defect rendering the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The notice of motion is struck out for being incurably defective.