benedict kilembe vs republic 2016 tzca 285 18 april 2016
Reference to a non-existent judgment date in the notice of motion is a fatal defect rendering the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.
- Citation
- benedict kilembe vs republic 2016 tzca 285 18 april 2016
- Parties
- Applicant: Benedict Kilembe; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Preliminary Objection, Defective Application, Citation of Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Benedict Kilembe
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection to Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to cite Rule 48(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules renders the application defective
- 2 Whether reference to a non-existent judgment date renders the application incompetent
Ratio Decidendi
Reference to a non-existent judgment date in the notice of motion is a fatal defect rendering the application incompetent and subject to being struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The notice of motion is struck out for being incurably defective.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment