CIVIL APPLICATION NO 867 01 OF 2023 BENEZETH RWEYEMAMU VS CYPRIAN ALEXANDER MLAY 2 OTHERS

CIVIL APPLICATION NO 867 01 OF 2023 BENEZETH RWEYEMAMU VS CYPRIAN ALEXANDER MLAY 2 OTHERS

The application is incompetent for failure to attach the High Court's judgment and decree as required by Rule 11(7) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The omission is fatal and cannot be cured by the oxygen principle.

Citation
CIVIL APPLICATION NO 867 01 OF 2023 BENEZETH RWEYEMAMU VS CYPRIAN ALEXANDER MLAY 2 OTHERS
Parties
Applicant: Benezeth Rweyemamu; 1st Respondent: Cyprian Alexander Mlay; 2nd Respondent: Salvatory Soka; 3rd Respondent: M. M. Auctioneers
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Procedural Compliance, Application Competence
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benezeth Rweyemamu

Applicant

Cyprian Alexander Mlay

1st Respondent

Salvatory Soka

2nd Respondent

M. M. Auctioneers

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is competent in absence of the High Court's judgment and decree as required by Rule 11(7) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009.

Ratio Decidendi

The application is incompetent for failure to attach the High Court's judgment and decree as required by Rule 11(7) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The omission is fatal and cannot be cured by the oxygen principle.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • Application struck out for incompetence due to failure to attach the High Court's judgment and decree.
  • No order as to costs.