benjamin hyera v danstan danny 2023 tzhc 17770 31 may 2023
The appeal was struck out because the appellants filed their notices of intention to appeal thirty-three days after judgment, outside the ten-day statutory period, making the appeal incompetent.
- Citation
- benjamin hyera v danstan danny 2023 tzhc 17770 31 may 2023
- Parties
- Appellant: Salumu Chalamanda Athuman @ Chala; Appellant: Ally Rashid Hassan; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Cattle Theft, Notice of Appeal, Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Salumu Chalamanda Athuman @ Chala
Appellant
Ally Rashid Hassan
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is competent where the notice of intention to appeal was filed out of time
- 2 Whether delay caused by prison officers can excuse late filing of notice of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the appellants filed their notices of intention to appeal thirty-three days after judgment, outside the ten-day statutory period, making the appeal incompetent.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out
Orders
- Appeal struck out for being accompanied with a defective notice of intention to appeal.
- Right of appeal explained to the appellants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment