benjamin h ndesarion ta harambee bus service sub40 bus services vs ms rahisi general merchant ltd another 2024 tzca 189 18 march 2024

benjamin h ndesarion ta harambee bus service sub40 bus services vs ms rahisi general merchant ltd another 2024 tzca 189 18 march 2024

The applicant failed to justify the delay in serving the notice of appeal and request letter as the explanation was based on hearsay without supporting affidavit from the registry officer, and the subsequent delay was not explained in the affidavit. The single Justice's exercise of discretion was not shown to be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
benjamin h ndesarion ta harambee bus service sub40 bus services vs ms rahisi general merchant ltd another 2024 tzca 189 18 march 2024
Parties
Applicant: Benjamini H. Ndesario T/A Harambee Bus Services/ UB40 Bus Services; 1st Respondent: M/S Rahisi General Merchant Ltd; 2nd Respondent: M/S Uhuru Peak Service Station
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Reference / Ruling on Reference From Single Justice's Decision Refusing Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Service of Notice of Appeal, Affidavit Evidence, Discretion of Single Justice
Source Language
english
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Extension of Time Service of Notice of Appeal Affidavit Evidence Discretion of Single Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamini H. Ndesario T/A Harambee Bus Services/ UB40 Bus Services

Applicant

M/S Rahisi General Merchant Ltd

1st Respondent

M/S Uhuru Peak Service Station

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Reference / Ruling on Reference From Single Justice's Decision Refusing Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant justified the delay in serving the notice of appeal and request letter
  2. 2 Whether the single Justice erred in requiring an affidavit from the registry officer
  3. 3 Whether the period between collection of documents and filing was reasonably explained

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to justify the delay in serving the notice of appeal and request letter as the explanation was based on hearsay without supporting affidavit from the registry officer, and the subsequent delay was not explained in the affidavit. The single Justice's exercise of discretion was not shown to be erroneous.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs