betty kavela vs rama shoki 2022 tzhclandd 312 25 april 2022

Applicant failed to properly account for the period of delay; reasons advanced for delay are insufficient; application lacks merit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: betty kavela vs rama shoki 2022 tzhclandd 312 25 april 2022
Parties: Applicant: Betty Kevela; Respondent: Ramadhani Shoki
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 25 April 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Locus Standi, Delay in Filing Appeal
Source Language: english

Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Locus Standi Delay in Filing Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2

Parties

Betty Kevela

Applicant

Ramadhani Shoki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient reasons have been advanced for the delay in filing appeal
2 Whether applicant has locus standi

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to properly account for the period of delay; reasons advanced for delay are insufficient; application lacks merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

Application for extension of time is dismissed.
Applicant to pay costs.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.