bhoke heshack vs heshack chegu 1982 tzhc 33 18 august 1982
The appellant failed to prove wilful neglect or desertion by the respondent, as inconsistencies in evidence and the existence of children during the alleged period of neglect undermined her claims. The grounds for divorce were not established.
- Citation
- bhoke heshack vs heshack chegu 1982 tzhc 33 18 august 1982
- Parties
- Appellant: Bhoke Heshack; Respondent: Heshack Chegu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Maintenance, Desertion
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bhoke Heshack
Appellant
Heshack Chegu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether wilful neglect by the respondent was established as a ground for divorce
- 2 Whether wilful desertion by the respondent was established as a ground for divorce
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove wilful neglect or desertion by the respondent, as inconsistencies in evidence and the existence of children during the alleged period of neglect undermined her claims. The grounds for divorce were not established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment