20130516 TZCA Dar es Salaam

The panel unanimously rejected the applicant's requests for recusal and referral to a Full Bench, finding the claims belated, unsubstantiated, and indicative of forum shopping, and ordered the application to proceed to hearing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: 20130516 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Parties: Applicant: Blueline Enterprises Limited; Respondent: East African Development Bank
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 16 May 2013
Procedural Posture: Civil Application for Review / Preliminary Hearing on Recusal and Reference to Full Bench
Outcome: Applicant's requests for recusal and referral to Full Bench rejected; application to proceed to hearing.
Legal Topics: Judicial Recusal, Forum Shopping, Review of Court Decision, Consular Immunities
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Judicial Recusal Forum Shopping Review of Court Decision Consular Immunities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Blueline Enterprises Limited

Applicant

East African Development Bank

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Review / Preliminary Hearing on Recusal and Reference to Full Bench

Legal Issues

1 Whether the panel should recuse itself due to prior involvement in related proceedings
2 Whether the application should be referred to a Full Bench
3 Whether prior decisions regarding immunity from attachment are per incuriam

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Applicant's requests for recusal and referral to Full Bench rejected; application to proceed to hearing.

Orders

Application to proceed to hearing forthwith.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.