boscow wilson warema 2 others versus tecla valerianl another 2023 tzhclandd 17294 26 october 2023

boscow wilson warema 2 others versus tecla valerianl another 2023 tzhclandd 17294 26 october 2023

The trial tribunal properly evaluated the evidence, found that notice was served and eviction was lawful, and the respondents' evidence outweighed that of the appellants. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
boscow wilson warema 2 others versus tecla valerianl another 2023 tzhclandd 17294 26 october 2023
Parties
Appellant: Boscow Wilson Warema; Appellant: Joseph Boneventure; Appellant: Evarist Beda; Respondent: Tecla Valerian; Respondent: Godrich East Africa Company Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Eviction, Lease Agreements, Notice Requirements, Evidence Evaluation
Source Language
english
Land Law Eviction Lease Agreements Notice Requirements Evidence Evaluation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Boscow Wilson Warema

Appellant

Joseph Boneventure

Appellant

Evarist Beda

Appellant

Tecla Valerian

Respondent

Godrich East Africa Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were lawfully evicted from the premises
  2. 2 Whether proper notice was served to the appellants prior to eviction
  3. 3 Whether the trial tribunal properly evaluated the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The trial tribunal properly evaluated the evidence, found that notice was served and eviction was lawful, and the respondents' evidence outweighed that of the appellants. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Decision of the trial tribunal and its orders upheld
  • Order as to costs