Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19980407 TZHC Tabora

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The trial court's findings of fact were upheld as there was no reason to differ; the respondent's evidence was believed over the appellant's denial.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Parties to be notified of the judgment

02

Material facts

Parties

Bulla Dohio

Appellant

Unnamed Respondent

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Damages Claimed: KES 300,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant denied having uttered the defamatory words.
Respondent
The respondent alleged that the appellant called him a witch and called three witnesses to prove his case.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    general appellate principles

    Findings of fact by the trial court should not be interfered with on appeal unless there is a clear reason.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The trial court's findings of fact were upheld as there was no reason to differ; the respondent's evidence was believed over the appellant's denial.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Parties to be notified of the judgment

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 7 April 1998

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 7 April 1998

19980407 TZHC Tabora

1 • - A~ 1.cil.BORI. Hjc CIVIL APPEi";L .i.,o. 37 OF 1997 ORIGJ:a.,"U, CIVIL CiJ..SE .1.,0.16 OF 1996 OF .i.,ZJlPt. DI STP..I CT COURT BULU. D'.)YIOI •••••••••••••••••••••••••

VERSUS . ~n:m:c:~u~,i:EJ:w. 1'.i~~s..i....•J;;l ••• _. ........ •••••• RE::lf'Q.i.\J)Ii;iliT Bulla Dohoi, t..½.e appell~tt wa.~ the original defendant i,., the District Cour-t of 'TTzsga Dist:eict, at lJzega.., He was su.od by'-·the respOAdent, origi:nal plai,,,hff', for Shs.300,000/= damages fo1...·defanation. He is al:tegcd to tave called the respoJ"lc.ewi; "a. witch" i:n a. pr.Lna.-::·y court. ··He denied to have uttered those wordc.·· The respOnde·,t called three witnesses :to prove his case wltil~ the al,'lpellan-t called no"'e• T.h.e -litia.i: beli1:;ved th-~ story of -;;b.e respondent a.., d rejeoted -that of the appella.,,t. A'fld I fi'nd no reaso,, to :fl.iffer with the trial cou:rt a fi,-,d.i1~gs of fact. 1 'lhere- fore I dia:i1iss tbs appeal with costs. /J ..,;ty\.,,_ L~7B .. HCllDr,.aE9 JUD3E 1p/2/98 Delivered ·b11is 7th d..zy' of' Ap:r:il 1998 in the ahsenoe of the pa.r~i;ies. 1 d~D . _L~-:~:;r'lll\J 1· l•..C.j T.1 JUJX;E 7/4/~ 01"der: Tho parties are to be .,,,otificd of this jud~icnt. ,_zv--- /l 1::s.. lviCID1,.E, J'"tJJ.XlE 7/4/<J!J

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.