Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

CIVIL CASE BUNDA TOWN COUNCIL

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, the allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and plaintiffs are entitled to judgment for the sum claimed with interest and costs.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiffs

Orders

  • Defendant to pay TZS 14,595,133.26 to plaintiffs
  • Interest at 12% from judgment date until final payment
  • Plaintiffs awarded costs of the suit

02

Material facts

Parties

Bunda Town Council

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Stamili Ndalo, State Attorney

Attorney General

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Stamili Ndalo, State Attorney

Abdallah Omary Magoma

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Service Levy: TZS 14,595,133.26
  • Interest Rate: 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Summary Suit / Summary Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiffs claim TZS 14,595,133.26 as outstanding service levy for 2019-2023, served demand note, defendant failed to respond or settle despite agreeing in a meeting.
Respondent
Defendant did not appear or file any defence; no arguments presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019]

    If defendant fails to obtain leave to defend a summary suit, allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and judgment may be entered for the plaintiff.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, the allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and plaintiffs are entitled to judgment for the sum claimed with interest and costs.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiffs

  • Defendant to pay TZS 14,595,133.26 to plaintiffs
  • Interest at 12% from judgment date until final payment
  • Plaintiffs awarded costs of the suit

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 19 June 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 19 June 2024

CIVIL CASE BUNDA TOWN COUNCIL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA MUSOMA SUB - REGISTRY

AT MUSOMA CIVIL CASE NO. 27090 OF 2023 REFERENCE NO. 20231207000027090 BUNDA TOWN COUNCIL.............................................. 1st PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY GENERAL................................................... 2nd PLAINTIFF

VERSUS ABDALLAH OMARY MAGOMA........................................... DEFENDANT

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18th & 19th June, 2024 M. L. KOMBA, J.: The Plaintiff above named filed a Plaint by way of Summary Procedure under Order XXXV of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019] praying for payment of a total sum of Tanzania Shillings 14,595,133.26 being an outstanding service levy payable cumulatively for calendar years of 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and January-June 2023 for the business conducted at the rate of 0.3 percent together with interest. Indeed, in accordance to the provisions of Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Page i'o?3 Civil Procedure Code (Supra), the Defendants were supposed to obtain leave of the court to defend the Summary Suit within 21 days. Undoubtedly, failure to obtain leave, the Plaintiff will be entitled to the Judgement and Decree on the sum claimed. The record is silent if applicant has obtained leave to defend as he did not show up in any of the scheduled date. That is to say, the Defendant have defaulted in obtaining leave to appear and defend the suit. Counsel for the Plaintiff has prayed for a summary judgment under Order XXXV Rule 2(2). The cited provision is to the effect that in default of the defendant obtaining such leave or of his appearance and defence in pursuance thereof, the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted. It pleaded by the Plaintiff while in exercise of its vested statutory power as a taxing authority served

the Defendant with a demand note for outstanding service levy but did not respond. Plaintiff was further summoned the defendant to attend a meeting for discussing how he (Defendant) would settle the outstanding debt which had accumulated to TZS. 14,595,133.26. In the said meeting defendant agree to settle the debt but in vain. Page 2 of 3 Accordingly, Under Order XXXV Rule 2, I hereby pronounce judgment in favour of the plaintiffs and against the Defendant for the sum of Tsh TZS. 14,595,133.26 together with interest of 12% from the judgement date till final payment. The plaintiffs are also awarded costs of the suit. DATED at MUSOMA this 19th day of June 2024. M. L. KO MBA Judge Judgement delivered in chamber in the presence of Mr. Stamili Ndalo, State Attorney for plaintiffs and in the absence of defendant as he did not show interest to defend the suit. IK M. L. KOMBA Judge 19th June, 2024 Page 3 of 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.