Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

CIVIL CASE NO

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Defendant failed to meet conditions for leave to defend; under Order XXXV Rule 2(2), allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted, entitling plaintiffs to judgment for the claimed sum and interest.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiffs

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Tanzania Shillings 27,704,499.93 as service levy
  • Interest at 12% per annum on decretal sum from judgment date until final payment
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Bundatown Council

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Kitia Turoke, Senior State Attorney; Mr. Stamili Ndalo, State Attorney; Anesius Kamugisha, State Attorney

Attorney General

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Kitia Turoke, Senior State Attorney; Mr. Stamili Ndalo, State Attorney; Anesius Kamugisha, State Attorney

John Kirongochi Marwa

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Service Levy Principal: TZS 27,704,499.93
  • Interest Rate: 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Summary Procedure / Summary Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiffs claimed the defendant owed service levy for the period 2019 to June 2023, attempted settlement discussions, and sought summary judgment due to defendant's failure to meet leave conditions.
Respondent
Defendant failed to meet conditions for leave to defend and indicated willingness for the court to proceed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019]

    In summary procedure, defendant must obtain leave to defend; failure to do so entitles plaintiff to judgment as allegations are deemed admitted.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Defendant failed to meet conditions for leave to defend; under Order XXXV Rule 2(2), allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted, entitling plaintiffs to judgment for the claimed sum and interest.

Court disposition

judgment for plaintiffs

  • Defendant to pay Tanzania Shillings 27,704,499.93 as service levy
  • Interest at 12% per annum on decretal sum from judgment date until final payment
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 1 January 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 1 January 2023

CIVIL CASE NO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

MUSOMA SUB REGISTY

AT MUSOMA CIVIL CASE NO. 000027089 OF 2023 REFERENCE NO. 20231207000027089

BETWEEN BUNDATOWN COUNCIL................. ......... ....... .......... .............. 1st PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY GENERAL................................................................ 2nd PLAINTIFF

VERSUS JOHN KIRONGOCHI MARWA............................ DEFENDANT

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18th & 18th July, 2024 M, L, KOMBA, J.: The Plaintiffs above named filed a Plaint by way of Summary Procedure under Order XXXV of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019] praying for payment of a total sum of Tanzania Shillings 27,704,499.93 being service levy which was supposed to be paid to the 1st plaintiff for a diverse period of time from year 2019 to June 2023. Page 1 of 3 In suits of this nature defendant has no automatic right to defend, the leave must be sought and obtained as per provisions of Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Code (Supra). Undoubtedly, failure to obtain leave, the Plaintiffs will be entitled to the Judgement and Decree on the amount claimed. However, plaintiffs sought and obtained leave with conditions and he failed to met conditions. On 18 July 2024 he appeared in court and notify this court that he failed to meet conditions and was willing this court to proceed. Today morning Senior State Attorney while assisted by Mr. Ndalo for the Plaintiffs prayed for a summary judgment under Order XXXV Rule 2(2). The cited provision is to the effect that in default of the defendant obtaining such leave or of his appearance and defence in pursuance thereof, the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted. It was pleaded by the 1st Plaintiff while in exercise of its vested statutory power of collecting revenue from various

sources includes taxes, fee and service levy, plaintiff called defendant in a meeting so as they can discuss how to settle the amount but neglected. Page 2 of 3 Without further ado, under Order XXXV Rule 2, I hereby pronounce judgment in favour of the plaintiffs and against the Defendant for the sum of Tanzania Shillings 27,704,499.93 being service levy together with interest of 12% of the decretal sum from the judgement date till final payment. No order as to costs. DATED at MUSOMA this 18th day of July 2024. 2 M. L. KOMBA Judge Judgement delivered in chamber in the presence of Mr. Kitia Turoke Senior State Attorney while assisted by Mr. Stamili Ndalo and Anesius Kamugisha, State Attorneys for plaintiffs and in the absence of defendant. UV M. L. KOMBA Judge 18th July, 2024 Page 3 of 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XXXV Rule 2(2) of Civil Procedure Code, Cap. 33 [R.E. 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.