CIVIL APPLICATION NO 773 17 0F 2024 BYBLOCK CONTRACTORS LIMITED VS SALUM SAID HAMED AND ANOTHER
The application was dismissed because the applicant filed for extension of time after the expiry of the period granted by the Court for depositing the bank guarantee, making the application misconceived as there was nothing left to extend.
- Citation
- CIVIL APPLICATION NO 773 17 0F 2024 BYBLOCK CONTRACTORS LIMITED VS SALUM SAID HAMED AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant: Byblock Contractors Limited; 1st Respondent: Salum Said Hamed; 2nd Respondent: Crown Action Mart & Court Broker
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Bank Guarantee, Eviction, Lease Dispute
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Byblock Contractors Limited
Applicant
Salum Said Hamed
1st Respondent
Crown Action Mart & Court Broker
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to deposit a bank guarantee as ordered by the Court
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant filed for extension of time after the expiry of the period granted by the Court for depositing the bank guarantee, making the application misconceived as there was nothing left to extend.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment