c6642 peter masawe vs republic 1986 tzca 60 11 september 1986
The trial judge was entitled to believe the prosecution witnesses over the appellant, there was sufficient evidence of attempted murder and receipt of a bribe, and the contradictions in the prosecution case were minor and did not affect the outcome.
- Citation
- c6642 peter masawe vs republic 1986 tzca 60 11 september 1986
- Parties
- Appellant: C.6642 Peter Niasawe; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence by High Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Bribery, Credibility of Witnesses, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C.6642 Peter Niasawe
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence by High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant attempted to murder P.W.5
- 2 Whether the appellant received a bribe and if that provided motive
- 3 Whether contradictions in prosecution evidence were material
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to believe the prosecution witnesses over the appellant, there was sufficient evidence of attempted murder and receipt of a bribe, and the contradictions in the prosecution case were minor and did not affect the outcome.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment