carlos albert kobe vs yusta william kanoti 2018 tzhc 2483 23 february 2018

The applicant failed to provide evidence of follow up or account for each day of delay; mere assertions without proof do not constitute sufficient cause for extension of time.

Citation: carlos albert kobe vs yusta william kanoti 2018 tzhc 2483 23 february 2018
Parties: Applicant: Carlos Albert Kobe; Respondent: Yusta William Kanoti
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 23 February 2018
Procedural Posture: Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Sufficient Cause, Limitation Period, Matrimonial Appeal
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Sufficient Cause Limitation Period Matrimonial Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Carlos Albert Kobe

Applicant

Yusta William Kanoti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide evidence of follow up or account for each day of delay; mere assertions without proof do not constitute sufficient cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

Application dismissed with costs