NA TZCA Dar es Salaam3 1
; AT D,\R ES SALAAM / CORAM: MUSTAFA, J.Aa; MA.i<M1E, J.A. AND Or-'.iAR, J.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 99 OF 1985 ISMAIL NAPO.SE o o o o u a o u o o a 0'1·0 o 0 o o o APPELLANT Versus THE REPUBLIC o • • • o o . . . . . . . • · • . . . . . RESPONDENT (Appeal from the conviction of The High court of Tanzania at Mtwara)...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NA TZCA Dar es Salaam3 1
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1982
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
; AT D,\R ES SALAAM / CORAM: MUSTAFA, J.Aa; MA.i<M1E, J.A. AND Or-'.iAR, J.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 99 OF 1985 ISMAIL NAPO.SE o o o o u a o u o o a 0'1·0 o 0 o o o APPELLANT Versus THE REPUBLIC o • • • o o . . . . . . . • · • . . . . . RESPONDENT (Appeal from the conviction of The High court of Tanzania at Mtwara) (Msumi, J) dated 14th Ja~uary. 198~ in Crimincil Session~--~'; No. 34 of 1982 J1JDGE:·<E1-.:T OF' THE COURT MUSTAFA, J.A .. This is a clear caso of r:1urder. Thri ::appellant litP.rnlly cut the , throat· of the deceased his wife?, and she died of loss of blood and asphyxia resulting from cut carotid artaries. ~~A app~llant cut thA deceassd with an axe. 'l'he appellant ahd thE~ deceas<=d had gon,9, out ·':O attend some cs~r::nony ,, in the village. Th•: appel la:··t ca:ne home, but the deceased remain-~d behind .and •e1urned the foi.1.Jwing morning. She went out again and returned in the evening. The deceased prepared food ~nd both sh~ and the upp1?llant _.- ai;e 11:. ~ After eating they rntired to bed. Th ! appellant wanb~<l to copulate 1 wU1h the deceased, but th,~ deceas,::>d declined saying she was not at that momen'f in a mood for sex. TrHJ app1?1lant desisted and the df'!ceas'·:!d want •o sleep. some three hours later 7 the app~llant: got up from his bed where he~ appaJrently had been brooding, picked ur, ah a.:x:e from under his bed, and cut the deceased' s throat whilt:~ sb? was and killed her. M9o./Rw~{emamu for the appellant befor_:~e /us submitted that the ~ppellant I / I V ..... /2 I r J 2 had killed under provocationo There was no provocationo The appellant certainly did not act in th,~ heat cf the mom~nt, he waited 3 hours before he killedo The refusal by the wife fJr sex in the circumstances was justified and could not possibly, by it~elf, araount to provocation. The killing was delib~·~rute and calc 1J1f,ted. The appeal is dismissedo ,I A. M. JSTAFA JUSTICE OF:i\PPEAL ii 1: '! L.Mo MAKAMJS JUSTICE OF APPEAL ,1 ·,1 JI AoM.Ao OMAR JUSTICE OF :I APPEAL hat this is a true copy~of! thn original. ij : i' I !I ·:r , :i .,j I 'I ( , (J.H. MS0FFE) " DEPUTY REGISTR1\R •