na TZHC Dar es salaam 4
Judgment or Order on Appeal (s. 320) ~ Cfimalo. 33 (Approved by the High Court under Section 352 of the Criminal Proethire Code). Summary rejection (s. 317) IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPELLATE JURISDICTION 150 70 Cnm'i. APPEAL No ......................... OF 19...... 938 69 Original Criminal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- na TZHC Dar es salaam 4
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Judgment or Order on Appeal (s. 320) ~ Cfimalo. 33 (Approved by the High Court under Section 352 of the Criminal Proethire Code). Summary rejection (s. 317) IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPELLATE JURISDICTION 150 70 Cnm'i. APPEAL No ......................... OF 19...... 938 69 Original Criminal Case No...........................................of 19......of oc1or* Dod.oc the District Court of............................................District at........................................................ before ............ .. ......... ............................ tistrict Magistrate. Appellant EIOcO CI1ZLP$J3 (Original Accused) j versus THE REPUBLiC. .................................... ..................................................... . Respondent (Original Prosecutor) CHARGE: 285 and 206 of the Penal Code, JUDGMENT/1k 4A?A, J* £ppeilant U30 COW4Cta4 of • cry w ith vio3o,rzce and eontcnceci to 4 yoare and 24 øtroke DL cepor 1 juniskmlent. Colix$ainaAt ws robbed of 220/u by fuur peronz 4o itthbod him in the proø. Co1aineivt had known aoXlent for a time. Complainant said it was appellant who ben tho attack, that he struij1ed with appellant and then tha other thre joined. i. Coaintuvb was pootivo he idontifi o d sptelltnt as ono of the robbere and th.;t he wo not Mietaken. V4eod oompin.tnt called ot the name of eppellturb cturthij the attack, ana Ithea oopleinent vecovered from the shook of tho attack be reported to the Polite St tion forthwith * giving thc name of eppeLltmt as one of hic taokrs. Tho trial Ktotrte baliuved the evienca of colainant, and he is quite entitled to do co. Appellant denicid be robbed. fl34ainant.tt WU a quection 0 oredibi1tj. On the evidence aldaced I cannot cay the trial megiatrte ue wrong to convict appellant no chargett. Oó1ainant cuMaiOod a uwbor of out and laoez'atcci wotuldo, I confirn the sentence. The appeal has no cubotanco. I certify that atti' peruning the rocord I am eatinfiod that thic appeal has been lo&t,d without safftciont a rouaft of coaplalAt and I order th..zt it be rejected aarily. U P Dim 10224/12-65100m/4up ( L)alaas, Jum