N

.. . ot - i .ou s T q.uqq. .nq 'oo qtjq. pirçqeq .UITedd eq s :' p s eouepç&e sçtj uç 'peqrnx uopoa eq eidccI oia& exeti. ve STTuTOodso 'T ;o uoissossocl UT sEbl eq eu015 1tfl tUOiJ POPUTOUOO eq q ou Pt°° 0,T S.TWqnS °H Oo q.vqq. puqeq pmo; s-am eq esnoeq iuo pe , oIuoo st TuGETO Stt q.ULIQ. Seti q.TXsedCT eq1. IOJ G ~ U OO A PU PeUXEGT OtIL sqo Anq o, uopon eiqo' , 9-qq oq euo pq Aoqq, 9, uL4 osTu qnq Tlas o qouTcIs JU13 aweq I. Ou PTP °tt - 9,U 14 pu UOTOtU? OT483 OIZ4 O. 9, q9 T lea 9, s OTTTA XEOL[q. Mal pe ej.az pstj icet - ttq STUO OU peTtSeq puq ieqqO E)L4 , uo 'UOT3fl' e1 . 3.4O eqq oq, popeoo aid ueqq. 'firs OfJOtLI tutOq. OT. q.13 q9UTdS pros psq - peJTqS8 OTTWt 'JeAe.40H. UITTI PE ) !~ SGLx leOOTTOCI 014 21tJ. 0J014 UTTA SA01t 9 TTLIm SM .t pus UOçOU% 9[q4O Gq. Ve 110 PT'-I Ot OS '.&OUOUI 914 tLITt( £cI o. TLI Ties oq i0AOAO Ptt UOJC[ —/ '1T WTtI poo OTS M OttO 905 o '&i soiTu Oi4 qnoq 'tzofl.ofl e1q4o et. o; qjo 9;t3eJotJ. ptt • cITLTsTi1o. 914U qo1uTds iT05 o. 1011;Oo. .no .os i5p 4UA0i0i 914 Lb ptj put. 11([ 'Aiettrsu . 'SietflO o WéTT0CTd aq Puu eq P7 5 2TeSutTtt D uznu 9 lOP tteaq tzTA?q WUTTOdclle 014 PUT O. OUOOS 814 110 OTLtEI3O pU .00id ieqou tz-çdwoo. oq. jo inoqq eu...XeT4ouS '!!.i •mttj p0S.eix oq 5u UItO3TTOCT s peqie -j13 00110 . pus uoçqon eqq. spMoq 1kO3 ueOqM. Otfl. O otto eqj. uees asq ut0cTd S. iocTd 0Oi00 o4•noqi etus oqq...dnuTc• u u1rtTdtUoO :.ett1i TTT d@931 oq. SttOT.TSOd SnOTiA 300 pus. 9i0t PGAOM JttITPiO005 iVoqj.aiot- i5p UTUOq.0n [1T.?q 14 'UOOflJ OOSOA1 w&o xopo oq. o ue.A.tip ueoq eq ?tuI .&eqq. , osS OUTOS 0 Stuoq. o. peiin000 aq Oq. sutoos 'wet4 io; 3fPOT oq. 9no4es ,stnoqqceuieAos. pire ô.q aiq—ip ieq.;y 'stoo ot ueoq.s pu q.tpz. 1.tra&et9i oqq uo uect eio S 1 t1tIT5ithUO0 014 O11T ueotc'&q. o, sauadd. 0 otto ouios SqUOr[O Xteq. 40 Siedd UTTT uodn ooi o. popuexe Rsoino.o x5woSno.. 014 0 -4fl0 uirseq oq. p94ttIp ttoeq 8A swes. q'ç 4514 pus qSTIOUI O[4 sq -- secIds .esqno eq. S TT81 ss lem efl4<) 0 90UG3O 014 .IOJ q.iflOO iaMol Oq. UT UOq.0ATrtOO S1Wi.i0 .dcIs eq. sUT13 .qoiq ueeq seq -CsedcI ou 5 • . . . . * OPOD TWea 014 0 99Z pU S/0 J014 0Tq43 iwtoa'i . •: rrnai aHT1 . SflSJ8A . • 1 vwoeimi 2 VNOf iTI\Ioaocr LV vwocroa io noo oniia aHL •o.L6vo 66L °N EI M ritito 'rNrDnTo LL6Ll d o . fr . °N JtdV 'WNITI]'dO NOIJDIaSIHfl2 aE.V viioaoa v S INZMV O iUflOQ HDIH [P1iL NI *9 4e97:tVS*'p1U 17 /141 C'- The full context of the ' -relevant part of his evidence was thai he saw a cowemerging frOm'tlie western side of the auction, à±d behind it was :the appellant That, he said, was away from other people and other cat -'u- -leil. He was arrested near the auction before tl' -tL cor reached other cattle. The witness was saying, in effect, that the apellant was driving that animal. The cc'mp'lainant was more to the point when he said he "saw the accused emerge with one head of cattle from the western side of the auction." The apellant put up the defence that he wdb not in poss.essionof that coaid that,he'had, gone there for a matter wholly unconnected with it., but considthing the p 1'Qsecution witnesses in the prevailing circumstances cOld not have been nistaken whether or not he was in possession of that.'cowad,,b,aving in mind the basic contradictions the appellant's evidence bears with, that of Dw.1 from which the only inference to draw isthat he and his witnesses were lying, I am satisfied he was rightly found to have been in posessioh of that cow. That was less than24 hours after the theft :.nd it follovis. he was rightly convicted of stealing it. Nr. C}ismbakre for the ap:)ellant has also made beavy weather of the fact thatthe learned resident magistrte after heaing.Pi.1 'and Pw.2 only, cancelled the appellant's bail beOause, as he observed, • there was already great probability that the prosecution woü1d'Ostablih a case, with theattendant.dangz that the apellamt might be tempted to cbseond if he continued to be out on bail. He urges, therefore, that the trial magistrate had been prejudiced against hi client long befoi th etrial ended I cannot, with respecL, read any prejudice in -the remarks made by the court as for, the rsason for cancelling bail. It was not in anywey prejudging any issues and it was then only preoccupied not rcth the gin,lt or innocence of the appellant but with ha possibility that in view of what he had already heardhe Liig}'tbe tempted to abscond. The magistrate inthy view was obliged to have such'- possibility in mind in considering whether to extend bail, while I cannot-fault the decision he then took on ii;.