NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 10
IN THE HIGH COURT. < 7 TAN:6ANIA i ,'I' uhF: ES SALA/~M AP?ELLJ-,.TE JTJRISDIC':c'JON HIGH COURT CRiiVjINA:::_, APP EAL NO,, 19 UF 1988 OrtTGINAL CRIMINAL C,~SE NO~ 225 OF 1987 OF TES DISTRICT COURT -VF' MORUGORO DISTRICT AT M0RUGURU i,BD;J,1,AH NASSORO v n o o APPELLANT (Orjg:nal accuseo) versus THE REPUBLIC O C O...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- NA TZHC Dar es Salaam 10
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2000
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT. < 7 TAN:6ANIA i ,'I' uhF: ES SALA/~M AP?ELLJ-,.TE JTJRISDIC':c'JON HIGH COURT CRiiVjINA:::_, APP EAL NO,, 19 UF 1988 OrtTGINAL CRIMINAL C,~SE NO~ 225 OF 1987 OF TES DISTRICT COURT -VF' MORUGORO DISTRICT AT M0RUGURU i,BD;J,1,AH NASSORO v n o o APPELLANT (Orjg:nal accuseo) versus THE REPUBLIC O C O ooooooco o a o RESPONDENT (Origjnal PrO~ecutor) J U D G M E. . ____ ·--·--•-4-----·--------- N _T'~ _l3!~-I!':T ~ 5, -~.:[.,:._ The.appe1lant was convjcted of.the offence 0f stealing by servant under sectj0ns 27"1 and 265 of the penal cnde and sentenced ··:o ·three yecirs: impris0nment, He j s · n0w appeal j ng against both ·.:C1r,·.r.i..c-::.:·.on and aentence" Th- facts as fnund by the Distrjct court are that the appellant was employ<:cd by .pt~ c 1 · Taj M0hamed as a lorry dr5ver of motor vehicle Noo '11 z6E:'7G 1 ., on Bth september 198'/, the appellant -loaded the vehicle wl1icl1 n.(:; v·as drivj ng wj th stones .f::-0m the st0ne quarry 0f pw·o 1 and ~~0<1k them to PlfJ., 3 after first arl'.".::i.ng ing to brj ng stc,nes t(' PWo 3 at e bui:cting site of hjs empl0yer. PWa3 pajd him 2000/= being money left with h~m b~ his emplnyer to purchase st~n§so · PW ■ 1·later on ~de~tified th~ st0nes sold t0 pw.3 as belonging t0 hjm and that they lldd been taken fr0m his quarryo. These st0nes were quite·djfferent in appearance from 0rdjnary st-nes friund in M~r0g0r~ area. The appellant was arrested and charged as ab0ve. I~ his defence the appell;nt de6ied selling any st0nes to PWo3~ The le~rned tr5al Magistrate add~essed hjs ~jnd t,.., the evidence and he accepted -::11e evidence ,~f PWo3 as trueo He fr-und PW ■ 3 t0 be a rel~.abJ.e w:i."c.ness.,_, He hnweve:::- f0und the evidence (•f PW ■ 2, a _witness; who was a·~ the bujl~ing site at the time ,-.,f the sale rif the st0nes, on my own evaiuatir-n r·-f the evjdence, I am unable te'I fault the findings 0f fact and the ~,-.,nclusi,-.,n arr5ved at by the l~arned Magist1~ateo Indeed the ~,'?arI0 ed fv!agistr?te had the advantege ,,f hearing anu seeing the witnesses~ 1,,