N
IN THi HIGH COUhT, OF TNNZJIh AT HBEY.a IHLTh JFISICTION (ieya Reristry) CE1aN.,L PIiAL NO. 61 OF 1981 - OGL GRIIiINAL C NO. 122 OP 1981 OF Ta DISTRICT COURT OF RUNGiB DISTCT AT TUXITYU Before: J. Iushokorwa, Esq., Distrpt eia'istrate, MBIL±kILE S/U .... ........ EUNLdT VERJS TilE E-UBLIC ..........................
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- N
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1981
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THi HIGH COUhT, OF TNNZJIh AT HBEY.a IHLTh JFISICTION (ieya Reristry) CE1aN.,L PIiAL NO. 61 OF 1981 - OGL GRIIiINAL C NO. 122 OP 1981 OF Ta DISTRICT COURT OF RUNGiB DISTCT AT TUXITYU Before: J. Iushokorwa, Esq., Distrpt eia'istrate, MBIL±kILE S/U .... ........ EUNLdT VERJS TilE E-UBLIC ....................... BJdS1OND1d-T C}RGE: 1st Count: Hoardi- c/s.194A of the nai Code, Cap.16 2nd Count: Trafting without a tadin icence c/si 3 (1) and 28 of the ilisiness Tac1iñ Licensing Act No.25/72. IYPRA, J. The ape11nt was char3ed 111th two c6ns hoarding and tfaing wi}iout a licence4 It was stated- that the pp1iaat owned- a 6ta1l at Thloiyu Market On 4/6/8.. IC, leslie Jd-.i) instmcted. tO eck on dishonest traders. Ho called at the appeflt' stall fuud- sucks of ioe He asked- the appellant ho sell some to 1e ut the a1peinrefed baying he was not se1iin: The Poii.ceemn d.eaan.hsJ brad-inN 1icetxa, The appellant did not have 0110, 110 was (11haxp,ed: as aiuvo In ais L1fece the appel.1nt denied- that he d-ealt in ri.oe. Icat the aoks of rce bund with hixt1n the reoTk.Ot was for domestic use. As fr the trading , Utsbnce he riied that he used- to trade in veNe.tahles the year peviotisy Th rket clerk (U.;2) supported. The oppellant on tAo woilit. Te trial rnaisrate acquitod the appellant of the first. coent of hoddng and OorlVicted him of th6 second count of trad-ini without a 1ioene end aentened bin to a fine of 5 00 / and forfeited- the ricë Fence this sppa1. - It is incnceivcahle that ihe ai:milarw. should, have buht bags of rice for d-onestiO use end than take them to the rea:±et place 24hd keep thea there. He was selling the rice to selected- baier at a 6oarinq prioe. Re should have been convicted of 'both counts. The Iappeàl has to rAerit and is dismissed- in its entiret.y, I 1Oth' -. -