19700307 TZHC Dar es salaam
1-op UT1Dt TO 0 - , sosuOwuIrts 11-v-tpDAjosJnp .iOaaO °H •pO1-tXOED1dO1 Ot S1M iotou puoq o-u ptp Thq TccId jo apunor2 STtj jo 1-Iodcs ut tuo o oo(E pus iodd ot. jo ?utxot o ut.xnp uosxod ut p ?ccTcL3 tIowo ulOtfl. - O o. Jc1.Tuflq.IoIdo otn. w oaç 1-Ott PTP S1- 1n0 O.JOMOI q. Tiq uoçsspuqns Sxq oAoxd 01. sossou l....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19700307 TZHC Dar es salaam
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 1970
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
1-op UT1Dt TO 0 - , sosuOwuIrts 11-v-tpDAjosJnp .iOaaO °H •pO1-tXOED1dO1 Ot S1M iotou puoq o-u ptp Thq TccId jo apunor2 STtj jo 1-Iodcs ut tuo o oo(E pus iodd ot. jo ?utxot o ut.xnp uosxod ut p ?ccTcL3 tIowo ulOtfl. - O o. Jc1.Tuflq.IoIdo otn. w oaç 1-Ott PTP S1- 1n0 O.JOMOI q. Tiq uoçsspuqns Sxq oAoxd 01. sossou l. Tik p2t ot 6 SUOTS030 AU?W.UO DUICLT ttowtiw ot.. wocj: o;p STT4 pOseTq o OtIM otT sviA q -ç orooq 4id tc:qT-cn) ott1- ~ SM T ,9- qsS1-T1- £OJW Dt1- O )pD1q 0111- xo; 0 W 2 IC. °1 1-CU St?M siTq punoaO oti uo janoD sçt. °1. pcT u odds itou czt ou • •w1t4 1.SUt13t? 09t30 OT1- -co 51.900 - •Otfl. q1-r T o p ? otj 9 sTq5 Vdoi °1- xopxO I W01q14 .tIowo sutz'?a s;soo J1.ort1.uo sqt ut t5icid ticsqs MOlTS 0.10 OIOj. I 1u0W11DP S t1-'UISUCtt1. 01. OJfl uooq 0At! p[flC)qS oi; sttq xoptsttoo I pu J;1.uP1 0 °':- 141- "'' otfl. ;o osnso oq pu 1. 12 L £1.T DU1. SM OiW .1US) S1-UUpU0JDp Dt[1- SSM 1.T )IUTt!1- -) I -nojts i 96T So 6L?oM Is-) Ut potsqnd so 'xopij (uoc1..IUI3oa) M5'I tUW01.SflD poorr oq. jo pu suoi1-00s £q po1.aoddns pooput pus o'.snbops oq 0 1. -cci q UOA) suouo.x o 1q q. •Z7.PTSUOO I S7 TfltM aAtI 01. pOqstM I0U0[ OU 09T5 DitspTss Tnq1UOWO1-519 OSt1. 02UOflSt0 1-0t ptp USUIOM ot •w-rt;[ tn.Tm poq ouo DASi! 01. ilosSox 1UO.1SddS US - EIuisnjox pus wttxoj oo0 o. utsnjox S T1.uolsTsa6d sam ots 1-°t!1- 'osnot stu opts1-nO uidoois pus ISMUiziutiux uooq petj ojtM s-ctt -'-t1- suossox t!1-IM OSSO OOJOAtp P01.fl1-T1SUt , osso 1 5 tt1 I •696Io tt°°N DSTO rc'-co ut - osso oo.xoAçp Dt!1- uç px000x Otfl. t!X o't i -:ptss 0 1-I1-Sc 5W 1-°c1.TP ot lsodthott1. ?trcMoTTs UI S-cI1Sw Otfl- JO :TSDXG Ot!1. .IOj DUITfl(' 01- .101.Tt1SP TW)I 1-ST1. pttnox 0i4 U0 POMOITS SSL 1th10 9 TH °I1.1.°• :o POt! 9 stq 11E2 ooq p-rod oq pirtots •ctl ptmox otr1- UO u0t9O0pStt1- 1SUTS ?12 1.O° 1.'1.'P Otfl. 01- posocicI • •ottw Ot!1. J0 )Soxq Dt!1. Oz 9fl50 Otfl. PUS x0t!1-0O1. POATI IDOt! IOt!1- 1-°t!1. OWI1. Ot!1- UOt1.SI0ptSUO0 01-Ut )tOO1- -°41- U0 90 0p SttT1- Ut!050t Uj touN iq pOO.IS 95 [U0 011.1-000 posq 1-° PITtOMTuqV9. 1- 01-I1. P{Ot! S.1OSSOSBS OM1. s-cti PUS Ot - wrtiTo stt xoddns o. sossou1-tz. p0n50 U 0TL * -RTuO 0 11.1. 0 JO peot .Vod °1- poox)s tXouio'i - ootxdptxq °-t1- jo punjol '/O7 pUS 011.1-SO JO P°°t! 9 XOJ exT3jejj o/s t.xouioi MSI-Ut-xOtI1-S StLI PE UOt1. DU n;sseoons SOM OL pus DOiOAtp iJ oJEL Tt!- PenS T,ceq-eS O uoTTeaedos Ot1- t!1- PUS UIOtj1- tZO9M1-O podoloAop utpuo1-s.1eptmstuI ° tI9tI . n-r ou psrr t!Ji 99"t1- log " 9t! Tt1-TM P9/VET PUS x91.tflSp SSW °ri( T aowgx p9-clr2UJ oqot{ o/s •aotxcteptxq ;0 punjel .Z0j 1Uç0[0 c scJ - •f 'VHOII)I (tit1-uTeTd t5Utt1O) NOdtH ' ' f 7tIOIH ITE SA - ° 0 0 0 ° 4 .uSpu9;9a TuTT1O)JiI jdd ' ThII)WI I1OIJEt)I - ('1..1no3 lSWiZcI nt4 woN t!1- ;o 6961Jo 60r 011 93 ItATO TUTTO 69T o TtAO Ut 9WtJS 1-° SlSj 71-10N JO 1-mOD 1- 0 Tl1-STCE 811- JO UOTSTOOp 9111- wox) IO 17 0N rWiiddV 'hAlO (oa) oL61 'MOIJDIctSIHfl2 JITIIdCW (x1-si23 1 1.OT 11STcI 91q1- UI) Q T INNYLI, JO JJiflOD TTDIH HT tI 72 •) 7 _ -2- This appeal must be allowed on the followin rounds. Soctions 151 and 153 of thc Dcc1aration arc only oxampics of common grounds for divorce and in considering the repayment of brido :calth the provisiorB of suctions 52-57 apply. It is my view after c::emining the primary court record that these provisions wore considered by the primary court boorc dolivcrin judgment. The District Court d:alt with the appeal as though the lower court had not made a ,finding based on these provisions and did therefore not give reasons for. diffcring with the finding of the lower court. I also do not agree with the district that the behaviour of Kemori's daughor ias so bad as not to entitlo him to a retention of part of the bridoprice. • For the a -", ov6 reasons the appeal is allowed0 The judgment of the District Court is quashed and orders made thcroic1.or are set isidc. The judgment of the lower court is rctcrd. The parties are to bear their costs in this Court and in the district court but Fabayi is to get his primary 09 costs. i uanza, . 7/3/70. /