19700428 TZHC Dar es salaam

.punot Sçtq UO ttTCIO S .u.opuoctF.oJ ?as s i uI tflOO I •itd ot pui uopuodsox tj prdvioo q.ou sum OT tjds.xxSd (c95T/9t1 ij) oouiotuI ;o s s uooq ;o tp29p TecTpou1rc sç i3p iutt1irLori qt oti Pou uo tTCTtO sct OSII?J jOu ptp A1.tt .LX1CIiE q prco i s99 ut ttrçp stq. ;o uoçqnsuç ;o uopuodsai ozi iI UIT OU. O(Lt iS On. rç s TO t.top ot. con jt 6 p:ct5u Stt3 o .iaTq SFJTrnsTt) q.ou p[flOLJS uoTq doq.S OS °TP- et. o.es oq G.xoqu!erl uzo uoturcns p 3t 'tq poqc otr uet[ rno STLfl. OOC! iUOW.•pSOf tTA.O s .uopuocIsx cq pio.xct aoq ~ xax si uptrçj rni s uotcteq to io.x; iqmtqs ço oact s 1 qupuodsox po.aTT Ot. OSX?)S O. PT51 S itptflOq ou ueaq OAStI o 0Sodci3 e.xetI.upT.e stjq. tio.x (papITp Oq o. 'qt:ts et. psrwo pus %oTTr-T qçqtLUOqfl toq So xo u113 . oAL: o. po:.o sç OtA usm e14) -euc ,~ qTH CojL uu iq zrcLT O! tXGAT? tS s a esirçq 10 psti uspuodso.t 'uotj rcun o .096T UT peçp çqqcttoqr uotii urq OtPr mox: ss 't icto 'qustrc c. cin (:UTJO UT Jt d1ti o. poqxocLxnct pus cqml -pj - Tri '.xctj.oui s 4 uotcIoqj LTL sAlt o suo LOI e-i (0961--oc6I) s xO 9 S o 2o sot st4 zo; qqsuoq txt7s Tcs -ta cu pospx uo ,5 uodsoa ot. . suisos 9.jdt000x si La p3Aoxctsp uSO" 8A5L O'. sxcoctc2 UO 13OIT5 sçu UOdtTO.I.IO — /06 P1 - wuOo p•ett au pThrt quopuodso ot '(uoticts.Lq oe;o sçt cSq. q.cI3ooi S UOttS SL' tflOD TT-) 96I UT —/oTJo eot.xd etq. .3 OU5q. taqn.roLu tiOt pU51 Ofl WOPOUTi 0961 UT POTP qTqsuoq; 'tq.OUI S q.LUi0CTd2 q.USSO.XCI Otfl. 50,flE[ SoZTL oUoosS STq Lc sp .ioq.;s pus (psss000p souTs) str SIT Tt pus qqsuoq Lq podosi.op pU 55Atq.flO •UE)tfl. SIOLA n j p.sATq.Ut0t1 r'itS LpOOM ss ptX2T Ot[q. ?E3flçA SquD3tS U [5S 'PUS SATI eq. q.UeL. pus oc61 UT uaq.IOd s iLl psuopusqs senuq a lj tq.ej s uStedds 'tqtqsuoq ;o uotssssoct stq. Ut uoq.Ioct stt q.SrLXq.UO Oq. PSPTOOP Sq5tq. PSTTOq q.uopuoctox otr, utStq uesA4oq pepTçp S-Uhl qoçtM sctTs POSOo3P T°' q.suq. q.ttopuoc1oi Lq p°rt ST q-I sstoiq 6 q.uopuodaoi stq. pus qquoq 'iatq.s; S UctSq. sLtno o U to:om . sçq iVo, po.tx m.xdEx S3tA ptt iouçt'i S si 'tdeq ttS1[SdS °'ri —/00G 0 q.s P0fl13As0,tS UUO S IOAO UtP2TO S TO q.0SCISSI UT St Taoctth STtrJ' :4 ;ixtnr ............ 11H.0IV0 IIiI W SflS.ISA (q.xnoo Listtrid sqony' !O 09/001 oj sso ITKcO au'ç;I - 91 T?U .OTIq.STP 'a Sq.eSrt j o.xooq 6961/6 •OJ uodv 1-To Ut Sqo:rci - 30 9,.xflO3 q.oiqsTp otq. :O UOTStOOp otp. u!oir) 0L6I J0 z C. v 0N rIyaJav riI;I (o:) - uotq.oipstrnf oq.sisctav Tfl1:T T7 fIir 0 J11OO I:JL i * \AL' •:- . . .2 It seas that respondent would not have rais ccl the clam 11 there id loen no eiisunderstañdii between him,and Di. likuba. Although respon- dent stated before this Court that before he was asked to cult by Bi. iikuba he had been cultivatjn that land, it is not, however, established that he had aseumed full PCsPeSsion of the property In any case, the respondent appeai to have abandoned the property for over 30 years as from 1930--1963 There has been no explanation for such absence. It is not at all clear on uhat roi.u'ids the district court disturbed the decision of the primary court. If I understand correctly the brief juduent of the district maistrate, he preferred the evidence of tile respondent to those of the appellant, brom a perusal of the record 9 it cannot be said that there was no evidence to support the appellant's case. For is there any misdirection apparent in the jud5ment of the primary court • Quite apart from the wealseess of evidence to support respondent's claim to the disputed sharaba (for example no boundaries could be found) 9 yet it would be uite ine:uitable to dispossess the appellant of a shamba which has been cultivated, developed and occupied. for over 30 years when the respondent could be said to have abandoned it. Accordingly, both customary law and e:uity favour the appellantt s claim to be entitled to possession. and ownership of the shanha without interference from the respondent. This result is in keepin, with the gcnexal land policy of this country where emphasis is placed upon occupation and development The appeal is allowed with costs to be assessed by the (listrict court. The judgmant of district court is set aside and that of the primary court restored. i -71 (B. . Seiton) 28/4/1970. JDDGE