19700504 TZHC Dar es salaam2
Tq11td(Jtseoeu otticoaq tons PTT0t) oouo;op P opw o. por e tt.trn000 Jo pozj.oui STTJ tzt seSlrtjjajqnS p9cI0p q.ioqtp pes -noov eqT Ve ITT t TT put allOo prtx. o. tSq pepoo,1 U4OC1 ST 1O'TM UOOTAtTOO IOdth11 Or). OOTIOPTAc) Turpunctv a , )Awioy sT etj •ot.xoo ojxJ oT n pop000ootJJTur aq O. ouo oiuoo M $OU$PIAO &t 2...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19700504 TZHC Dar es salaam2
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 1970
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Tq11td(Jtseoeu otticoaq tons PTT0t) oouo;op P opw o. por e tt.trn000 Jo pozj.oui STTJ tzt seSlrtjjajqnS p9cI0p q.ioqtp pes -noov eqT Ve ITT t TT put allOo prtx. o. tSq pepoo,1 U4OC1 ST 1O'TM UOOTAtTOO IOdth11 Or). OOTIOPTAc) Turpunctv a , )Awioy sT etj •ot.xoo ojxJ oT n pop000ootJJTur aq O. ouo oiuoo M $OU$PIAO &t 2 UTP T OtT Tnq W 014T CT pI12t 41 UOtOpIOflS -)WOS , 4 S eJ$t{j. ].$q. X1W0.I tflM J1E?FUITtt tfl4tI$.tIOO OUfl'3 XOtflO $tfl. 110 [1ethi ELt UP,0UO0 WOIJ PauTeaToa SUIT TUOPTSO K potri tji lJ.m0O qT JTT J uq. jo oads.x uT .zoj pun000vtm st Oe UC, ~ l q -sqg jo I imowr tX] •oocq ST -q drt ut:w trç pooroot Aq poiootxoo U()tOOTWU'O Ttjj tfl0tj. pftIPq T ou aaem —/0o9'T —/0Q6't 'stj JO SWIMS J$Tfl1J TVIII. po.Otx srq all uouejop OTfl. iq p$IOJ. 0 ouotltnrrcTxe $Tfl. UtO29 W$Tfl..0O 0'1{ )TJ12 UOtTh0OId et. ioji eo atç Jo OttO TP P$UTWX$ ifl.,$IflO '.00u; O'1t SI2flU pt1. $Tfl. ' XQUJipflC OIt U] wçq j 0j Tes pnt p0000 iotrii t to'o xoT) dv~ ,-n oqT ot rrtT 'iou prp $ ihlT u$pp9.j at utljr1c!th1 JC.I$A ot •z$l'T sAp @Ms poAt000x wrw - twt i 0. UtJJ$,39J Sq UttdXO o. S , Tl l 0AV9PTIG q.T TTofdr otq. ttoT '01L6'i oq jo tmoum $ilO JO ttOtOSUJO $O1dU 1 O 0 P O' )O11TiO0 O101fl. toxt qo tto peAt$o$J eTth)ItO t jo To a dsa4 ut Oj UT OT (toItw tt/ uo apmu uooq ot o " iod.ind toTM) Tu a w9 n d oij •flmfl $tfl oqut pt?c1 ueaq ThrMlt Sr 0 Ind OWUS ot. tzo zmoto uoeq oo pt o/L6't •oC jo tmOun1 T.n no otrToct (ootzojop Stil UT Op oq p.inoAplx$ 01I ste) Tz?cdde TO tto ai ISTII TIT pono et.j, •uoq $i. ut un000 o. ).1inoJq uq pti t/T9t •st JTU0 Y't .nq o. Lti sor .cip30ox 110 Tu at?Tiq po.oeoo troeq p;tj "MTS oo urns , snOj ottflt ttoptso pawo OTfl UTOC( U 0500 0 OIl qThOç) OIfl. $FltiJtrOO Oq c1wo4o os.ioqtyop JJ$I. S SOM $tOlfl. J1tf. I1,9 T T O34w poor000 etq. Aq U$A - Stt0TStzifl(1X9 ot. ptti. q d,-;)N ttooq Er.t[ ooq tBt?3 oT. TOTI4 UT IOTITIPIIJ $TJ. JO Ap0').O p120 d000 O. 0OflJ0,I 11fl0O 11Yt,X $l. t1OP.$ s uoimi,xo ,xstwts JIOJ UT4nC $q o. toodth? 'po&th JO trOt14$I TtT IT trn1od 1 qj, IU0WpflC OTT lit TUOPTS017p01?$i, $tJ 0 ttTtioSroj !40fl0J 0. MOtI $TqT050CI St T PU Pa&T$o l200q f'0u eAStj s.qttpco $O$T '0110 9IOJO sitrn0000 lOtfl.O PUP 000z otfl. UTAq TTt07TTf4 'tr0T4t$d STtl TI P 0 T 7J01TO(T(TS OIfl t5tt?4 sutod O1 ptiSUJ0pUfl 0. 0qp3S0du!t XjjPPTJTA SlIM ¶t U0 110 S$TStXOO JO3 (lit $I1SO ioocjdo em. pmt. GITITT $Ifl. lI p$pJt'MiO OU 0I0M 0000 -01T1, Ut I3TttX0 OTII OT 10 'T.50dc10 sTtn tfl'cM 1ttTT p tno St lilT O[ep Gwoo uo'q smmt '[OOCIcI\J JO 11OTT0d eqsiepstmoo u pe'' - sou pus tTOT.otAtIOO tonS .O[ztVhm % Ib Jrt03 OTtfl. o $P0d(J5 MOli H 'o/' ?Ut410AUT pt?t SOM tTOt0tIUOO 0 tOtttM 110 LUit03 T2tflt0W$J 07 '0.UflO0 0S$74-T JO E)J\tJ 110 0 t01O$ SOM CIT ;S ~ UnOo XtS lit P8Jfltt0 mieeq ZUtAmt 'epOç) 1J71e,r Otfl. JO 112 Puv OUOtO0O oq. JI.iITJOO 'tTtItJ$S TflI$S 30 00 l2 $JJ 0 . 1111 JO p$OtAUOO SOM .tflhTteCIdti aqT, 'f 'N.XTTiTT JruDanf Sep00 T rLTGf $Ifl. JO pUt , NI 0 T 0 A'q UTTIaC4S :xq 112 0/0 S, LUnAa0S PtTS '''''''''' oian.iii rra; ilrrrjr{vø ' ' 'p TI'f.&IIX 11ItWJT ttTlptS$j - •bor ousjtmj • T1'?i eiojer Sc !1.S -°T'5Ta 59 1S([ JO ITi0 TTI 3Ifl. 30 6961 J O 166 ' 0N O0 1 0 UTWTl0 Toutiio) oL6i JO T 'ON TctlJ ISLTtWTX3 WOOtlI e VINVZiI1J tO J1MO0 110111 3L)1 NI 1 '1 2 — This Court considers that the evidence before the lower Court leaves no reasonable doubli as to the gailt oi the accused and that the appeal is without substance, Sentence is certain:ty not excessive and is in accordance with the provisions of' the Minimum Sentenoos Act. A±' -ter reading the record this Court is satisfied that the appeal has been lodged w±i;hout any suficient ground of complaint and I consequently order 'that it be forthwith summarily rejected. a Dar as Salaarn. H1JLYN) 4th May, 1970. JtJDGE