19701214 TZHC Mwanza2

. . . . . . .ptZ UOotM1OO et. 92M sUOt.OeS OI4 JO t(OTTM .ZettTL MOtflf.O q.Ue M8 Ut S2M u8TTedd? etij 'UtOO Suo ut pewz e.xeM seoueJJO toa *ePoo t8Ud etj jo 61 Pus 9ZI UO39S .XpUTL seouSJJo r.oUt.St OM. qq.TM 'p82.r87o svm TasTledds sj .qnop e 5U05281 puoVaq ei. pa&o.xd 1 st uoqrioeso.xd e scs aT4 uew4 uew estw PeUaT e-T tTt .xeat .ou sc -i pnooe ttop S[q8uos8eI TTS pu04eq 8580 pto.xd uo r'oeoxd aiql. esTt8oSq aoue;ep psrtoo 8t. tTM ee.X8 q ou OP I o saa Rv ad ei. NOds o. eou8qxr.sip 2 pSSfl2O aq 552W 8T q.instp O. UOtU9UI tM pasnoov et4. SAOJd O. SQU8pIA9 U3tQtJJTs St 9J8t. asnvoaq 3OtX8pT8 UO13t08SOJd 8T2,. TIM e.r22 OP L — 2I8 .3UI 'p12s 8S8W -.OTX~ STP peU.X281 @lql a saeRvid JeO JO 8U810UU2 et O. STPTLOT 09 PTP PU-e BUOS .U8I9JJt 2 8QflpQIUt eq I. Vqj. UT 2U T 2UT p aq m4 s Tp 8A.2t 01. P 8 tI 8 9 T U8[18dd2 1 2 uos qncT 2TT aj Ut2qJ8Q 8 ut;onpuoo S84 T saxid eifl. ejttM Pus .zos2d aqq. pvT7eq uot;tsod Is 4 00 .U'e TT edde Ot e0UeptA t; woi. '3pue42 OqM 8dO9d 8t JO SUC S2M pasnoov et1 8PU842 ITOM 52M 'S.X88dd2 1T tt0tTM ss2w STOq 8 P T 9Tj qo.xzt.o ps atq jo .io;sd at oL/c/ot uo 18910 LISA OtI St O.Xfl929W 5TT. 9)2. O!. Pvlq toxrn.ro tM 990TA 8 S sTt PeUTWI tIrno 8 w oL/i/L u otx!stp smssK UOtSTATp TIH UT t(0.rnt3 'Pt121u1 U2OTJJV eq Jo e2u8AT trs ewTj. suo q v SW.t U2118dd8 8t.J — 8.XSM sqoj 8.fl. .JOt$ UI UflO0 GUO UT PeI8T40 SJSM gaouejJO ueiejjtp OM esfl8Oeq pe.ieue T2OTOTAUOO e. 58M suOtqo$s.OM. etq jo q0TT4M J9PUTI 12910 0U 52M ptinO.x at. UO UOT.0TAUO0 31. xodthis qou prp iedd8 STTfl. PSflI2 OtTM &eU1O42 aq.E.S P''91 GtJJ, C T18 UOTOtAUO0 81 .SUT88 .IflO0 STq. O. POTTadds MOU S2T. 9 H U8WUOSTCZdWT 8tUOW SUTU O. peoueues Pus 003 18US d eqq. Jo 6i Pue 9ZI ss/o 92utIeeJ 9tOt1eJ pImOM O. J.U9qUT qq. TM SpIOM 2UTJe44fl ptl8 £qWes92 9ttOTtIeJ 8 JO p80IAUO0 pus 1T14 P918tTO SRM 9S80 GTT.p,. UT qusTTadds 9t VVAVZNN a'[woanr SO3 18USd 8fl. JO 6i P us 9ZT UOT389 O. AV.I8.X.UOO V U1 1 99j Sfl0Tt9.X pUTtOM oq. ?ti9qUT 9T. Th1-P SPIOM 2 UTJ9 1.q.0 P us 8eflqwess8 Sfl 012tt 9 J uq14ST DVHO ° ° S 5 C LNtcIN0dH° ............ .... 0IIfIdi atii LNVnItIaddV • ••• .........Co.. • •O C •OCC••• 000.oSCS INVHN Uawclsos 881S12 oTJ.sta ''ba '2U8cwT2nU °] 91OJ9 8M58N 8 MS8W JO Tainco OTZ.ST St jO oL61 JO 00? 'ON 892D t8T2twtJD T2UTEJO oL61 do ic 0N IYddV 1VNIWII0 NOLL3ISflfflf aLVrlrI g ddV VZKVIAW aiv nniztw. .io JXWD HDIH iir iii -2- This anomalous situation would have been avoided if the provisiois of section 136 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code were followed. This section is to the effect that - "Where more than one offence is charged in a charge or information, a description of the each offence so charged shall be set out in a separate paragraph of the charge or information called a count. In this case the learned magistrate proceeded with a charge of one count which embraced more than one offence; inspite of the mandatory provisions of the above section. As it is difficult to say that the appellant was not prejudioec by this irregularity the defect is not curable under section 346 of the Criminal Prooedure Code. Another reason why this appeal was admitted is that the magistrate may well have misdireoted himself as to the burden of proof in a criminal charge when he said "I do not agree with the accused" because the prosecution proved the case beyond all reasonable doubt". I agree the use of the statement - "I do not agree with the accused" is unfortunate as it may be interpreted to mean that the magistrate convicted the accused because he did not believe his story - But the learned magistrate immediately followed this statement by the words ---------"because the prosecution proved the oase beyond all MY reasonable doubt" - This, inview, is an indication that the magistrate was aware that onus of proof in a criminal case is on the prosecution. I am however of the opinion that failure to follow the provisions of Section 136 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code amounted to an incurabl irregularity. The conviction which is not supported by the Republic is hereby quashed and the sentence is set aside. I have seriouly considered whether I should order a re-trial but in the circumstances of this case I do not think it is necessary to do so. The accused has almost served the whole term ãf imprisonment and, if I may add, it was due to the fault of the prosecution that the fatal irregularity came into being The accused is to be released forthwith unless he is in custody in connection with another charge. Delivered in Court at Mwanza this 14th Deoember, 1970. (N. . }4!r s), AG. JUDGE. De Souza for the Republic. Appellant - absent & unrepresented.