19710612 TZCA Dar es Salaam

uewuoscwi stt.uow si%. $t t0CM STW tT Ot(, eoueuas ej puc 961 .oy sa o uq ~ uqs WnMTUTII at; iepuu souoo %.UUQO %.O %. aspun OOUQJJO t%. PTVo xqin; OqG •OOUGJ;O eumg st; aOJ OOP4 uq%. Oa Ow puud s %.uttsdd Gt ev epo. ! t9cI JO le u0l .00V jo suottoxd at%. uas.x.uoo S%.UtOO JwtOJ uc saoue%.ue puqs sau z oq.%.y S%.UTIOO eex qj et4%, tIUfl pOtOQ0 ST t4OP& —/000'61'sti ei. - eoiioo Os smis Ovl. 30 eoq, J0J $%.OUOO puv paao o v a eq junoo ifl0J 5t%. J e Pun Pufs Øt, Gt%. JO 9L '' - t'96t ov io tT 0%, s/o saa%.%.O JO aojoe a Ta eqj 0%. %.UOUL qs ,iOj PO%.OGUOO ow ns U1$ 0%. extaj IOJ MOTAVOO Put pro St t( S%.UflOO ØIt. %.SJ U •wns sp $iO%.S pu jo ro e 0%. _/000'6rsig uTjq.0%. O'%. XO%.%.QI SO Olto W0IJ W1 q poeOQ SWT5 e qtwsx 0; pete; OR et;uow eevq; ioj ;qq. p.uoo Os pu °H •eq.o jo to%.oe.Ij O%. 0%. $$jQ%. £.Ia;%.Ot jo es uio; ps;osuOo Os sums ; t%.UQW t(OO pUOJ 0%. 4p Pt S* %.T P uV OT T qnd JO saaq.meui 0%. $%.Og o o Tlqndog et. Lq un.x Rvraq SX 8 %.q,OTon s;eo; Lzefloi ttas o. ;ue.vv uV. ssii, ir sa %. uvjja ddv ei ATh 0%. .Keuow 012 'Ae.noauoo tzmi 0%. e.re souøq.ues et; se uostzl UT 2UOT Os SQ 0%. sT Ot{ JT XOJJnS ttTA OT.1& S%.UpUedp Augui st put Pto aCj si ei vcvs all stt Lie.A ST 1?TS OR iotti& eoue%.ues s; s1dIg Rte flct UO4otAUOO $T%. OU$(T4O %.OU seop S WLL%. sW.IS%. XGO U! pçs u T e9a et UOt%.Sflb s;xno0 0%. pue tsdd $ttt%. JO VuT av oij Et%. .XOJ uOsiøci Ut paxe addv 3H •UO eoauss j.SUTVSV elveddvi&OU %.uItadd 6 %.U8WUO5LIWt St%.UOW a T 0%. peouaus sç aT. %.UflOO t%.tOJ Bt1. COpUfl $OUSJJO eq%. .IOJ puv qUtioo OO 120 %.ItJ5) Ut %.ueuxuosTtdurc stt%.120u1 ItS .10 —/o's'ti paucj SUR Ot S%.UflOQ 8S.11%. %.$.1J StI%. Lapun SSOUO;Jo at%. Jog •q.UrtOo t%..ItlOJ O%. .IepUfl %.U8 £q iUTt'$%.S .103 W2 $%.UflOO $OZ ..tSpUfl s%.e(c)E%. £Xe%.%.0( JO GTS JO spSeOO.1CI %.SU S%. SQt.I%.%.0 JO .1O%.o$.Xj St)%. 01 %.tUIS.1 0%. 1UtttJ 8 .1OJ pS%.Ot&2O0 Sit %.Uij9d(i at LNaXLflh POQ tuea 3%. JO G9 puc (o)L 5/0 %.U6V iq Vul lu als jo %.Ufloo %. 30 9L'do '96I %.QV JO S%.5)0t%. E a O*q.Oj JO 8T5 JO SpQSOO.1d %.0 $LT%. SSt.I6q%.0r1 %.USuIU.1SAO-3 JO .10%.0e.1t(J 0%. %.pilS.X 0%. UTIJ JO 5%.UttO0 Myqrladav INYSNH crawvyrow v&v. O%.%.J uepsej '*boa 't& of tajojaa ' OUMVTVS 55 ava %. %.O T X%.VTG Wtt Be ava 30 %..1t100 %.Ot.1%.sia 8%. JO 696t JO 691 OJ 050 UtWt.IQ Tct1t5Jt.1çj tL6i 3° OI ' 0 1 i5ddV txtwiz wv'ivs sa uvct iv VZ.YL do Jzfi0D HOIU aul Al 2 . is not correct. She further said the trial magistrate should have made an order for compensation for return of Shs.19,000/-. The learned State Attorney formally submitted that the appellant should be punished either for offences under the first three counts or Lunder for the offence Jhe fourth count but certainly not on all four of them. She submted that the appellant be sentenced correctly under the Minimum Sentences At 1963 for the offence under the fourth count and that sentences imposed under the first three counts be quashed and set aside. Going through the record it is abundantly c1ea that offences under all four counts arise out of the same transaction, and to charge and convict him on all four offenoes and to order that the sentencea shall run consecutively 'amounts to, punishing the appellant more than once for the same offence This indeed contravenes the provisions. of section 21'ofthe Penal Code, which reads: 'A person shall not be punished twice, either under the.' provisions 'of this Code or under the provisions of any, other law, for the eame offence." Thus it is clear that the sentences imposed by the trIal magistrate contravenes the provisions of section 21 of't'he Penal Code. He should be punished only once for what he did. The learned State Attorney submitted that the appellant be sentenced for the offence under the fourth count which is contrary to Minimum Sentences Act and the sentences imposed for offences under the first tbro counts be quashe,d and set. aside. To this I agree, Accordingly :1 order as follows* Sentences imposed for the offence's under the first, second and third eount are quashed and set aside. For the offence under the fourth count the appellant is to be imprisoned for two years. (J.a. PATL) A. J. 12/6/71. It is further ordered that the appellant pay the Republic of Tanzania Shs.19,000/- as compensation. J.B. PAPit 12/6/71 No order for corporal punishment is made ar, the appellant is 52 years old. 3.B. PATEL, AG. J. 1/6/71 Delivered in Court this 12th day of J'une, 197 1 in presence of the appellant and the State Attorney, Mr. Somi. J.B. PATiL,AG. 3. 12/6/71