19710329 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Veto 'UO.OhUOO tO8 wo.ij seTI I v eddv ott pu '1 wo STlq uo pao&uoo Et.IedoJd Lre.z. si&OR * 41T n2 pepe-d XITJV WnTOA PVTTeddv øtq, .ua.ddB s utpaeooz5 stzq ;o .xoue. etotp& eq. wo.z; '.o; u •uooxeoo Ruv o. peqoaqts aa et eso u tjq epu-ç oq. piooe.x ei; uT OUT TV OU ST SISt. 4 SITTTq T O S 0d tOUS epnioxe 1,ouuv o...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19710329 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 1971
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Veto 'UO.OhUOO tO8 wo.ij seTI I v eddv ott pu '1 wo STlq uo pao&uoo Et.IedoJd Lre.z. si&OR * 41T n2 pepe-d XITJV WnTOA PVTTeddv øtq, .ua.ddB s utpaeooz5 stzq ;o .xoue. etotp& eq. wo.z; '.o; u •uooxeoo Ruv o. peqoaqts aa et eso u tjq epu-ç oq. piooe.x ei; uT OUT TV OU ST SISt. 4 SITTTq T O S 0d tOUS epnioxe 1,ouuv o euo qoiy uanbs.x;uT jou e pvoTd o peo.io; e.zs* Set. utedd? Sq suoey OouGUSs ,ueuet ssd o () noo i ° UToU 04vq Itt :UOTW u -c pes Ot( eou oq. qu eA eTeajT qou s 'eood eu Sq p?ajcl ol peo.xo; UOPP26M 84VIS IT e dduaq. jo A$& uj std uao sp uo pa.opizoo Siedoci LwA BII siq Sudzns WM •oe.zzoo eeM UOflI1O$8Q.Id atjq, £q no q.es so; e sv pepiooe.i OT q.ueds OU p t°q st oit $usT le d ds ej Ljuo O V A 9, T prn BuTdiaose uç peeeoons Ils Lst. ;nq 6 pe ~ oGalB O J Sht uew 49 TP ewos ptm U?t(ed? et1. 'uot .se.&ut o sv JO 9U1.A. e o. s.nu i&eq'Bo o SScL Ge.I wo e.zotq uetos s'it e1eqq, pu owç ueo.xq OVA e.xoa a uuç'aTwoo eq jo ZOOP et. STf. O. $.ZG* qoT -qx 'soj e eçoGi uolqZ JO.flOO8OIc! eij.j • etdoe aato Sq uetos svx ct xo •anu !4O10 jo Seq otto etoa i () •eanoi eT. OUT ooq I :sSl pepxoae.i Ov V 9 Td a,u'?tIedde ata uouequ' Lw .ott si .nq 'pGtstuçj eq ptota oso iep.io uos op o. ORJi 0OT T Od etq. Sq OVA i aij4 o. orip pOpUetd J41 :eonb i puo ST T V addv JO uopt.ecI sttj UT qo se Tsedds S O ooTxssqns 0T pus 4tZTt6thr9 &Ott Q uowqoiund todzoo seos .znoj—Le Lioq.n.a eta. oq. pus aoS oi. to; 1.U$WUOSTZcIWT o peous Ixes BA OtT PU . oao 4 o 905 PUV 9u T3rvoa q— — ;o '?etd uio att uo po;opuoo OVA U 9tIes et Of NOR IEL orncrnr o'a et; JO 99a pu (1)96 u8eqo pu utpttiq v OUT uexa :xoTo JAffUodgELU OIE11i RR IL tiiMVii nzvawiva (wcw Qtq.o( "bosj 'O.tOUOTE • .e.zo;eg OttOI O qMcr OAe1 Jo .ITOØ e; ;o OUT ;o iL # OX 98 s3 tuwT3 !UT!XO) tL6t jo aaddy t5tt'WTiIO vilwava, 40 JT11OD HOlE REL bl, 2. With regard to the sentence, as the appellant in his' petition of appeal submitted, that he was only fifteen years of age, .1 had the proceedings returned, to the convicting court with a direction to have the appellant medically examined as to his age. The appellant has been medically examined and the medical oerti ficate which has been forwarded to this Oour't is to the effect that the appellant is nineteen years old. The setenoe imposed is therefore the inimum' prescribed by law, the offence being a sàbedulód. one under. the Minimum entenoñ Act 1963 and the value of the poperty involved. exceedinghs.lOO/— I am satisfied and so crti'fy, that this appeal has been lodged without any sufficient greun& of complaint. It is a000rdngly summarily rejected (PBThI? IRON) JWXi Dar es Salaam, 29th March, 19716