19710111 TZHC Mwanza2

-I . S S I S S punoq 1VU101jo UTMOtS purto.x5 3t. tzo SsM e.xetfl. eOUOptAe TS1114 I'[O TOU t tflO 6TUPTTedds etq. oq. peuoeq PUVT jo TOTd pe.ndstp aqT TsqT PIa-T -i A.i'ptmoq ueithesqns qqT poxtj TjoTvuV ajojeq Apunoq IPUTPTJO q. WqTqT O!. UMOtS pt 9ouo ,qdjV Tvqj.q.o; aqT uo P 9 TTGJ OSTV TaUO 0 TT"- L SSUtM aouejap et. 2uTaq j9TTvT et. 'oq.ur pus eouoqdlVjo UptI.e a- pdeoo 'snowtuun 'xnoo TvTJT et. jo .xnoj T2TpTO9p UI e jo Tasd SJ8O eTj. TTM e;xeuT ptt stqd OM. et. jo qottp TTe ojtet. ou pinoo aq pu 'qwts jo zd s xqto oqu peddes eAo pt i'poqiVu xetetM T19T Tou pinoo et qrta 'qwqs pe.rtdsip eq jo setJpUrLOq etq M9U4 et( pUito p.iwp Utiedds a7T jo TsqT st ,czedo.xd ewtq. jPTjaTvw ailT Tu TTiq '.xpuy jo STa9doad etq. uei. sum idod eqq. &pimoq aq. pexi; eq ueqm qitq. pts txouv 'uotutwxe -SSO.X3 U] eIcttsTA 11PS SM icreptmoq stq put 'su1d i1tLwpUi1 utud ScL £xpunoq eqpextj oqm euo et. st eq ps t.xou' eq'$p, TTTTs st 'paw-t - o et ' tTOTTIM 9uTT ic.iputtoq 911T p9XTJHtoU1J iuenboscns etj Tnq 'qws TsLIT 2uOTvsIw &.xpunoq ou sit eiet. 11ucxo qqq. pts eq 'Je/.eMOT{ 'TuVITeddv etq. oq pu peudsip eiq. PI0S pvq OtM CUO aqq. SM uaapuV jt mou3f Tou pçp et .erpuy JO IeT.flo1q etTq Sex aouoq- dTV TelqT peex et 'uoputuixe-ssoxo jetxq UI peix.xw et.l ueq xetqJ sTtj Sq wtt o. UeAt SM TT esrtoeq Tup1jadds wqT a; PusT jo eoetd stt. Osv@TaJ ;OupTrLOk 9t( eTq pteS ;UepUOdsex etfl. iet;o etj; u 0 -SJVWVMPX V9aPUV teij;oxq sii wo.xj q.t ;9noq oit ;uiiedd ei; o; peuoeq ;T Put 11 9.ttdSTp Ut PUVJ 9TJT MUD pewio eouoqd (tnwTtw) srw Apuuoq eq; paxtj sTjV U8TM ;ueseid SM et ;tq. pwe 8961 ';sfl2flv JO 7q1 eTfl UO J97;O1qsti UIOJJ PUBI JO aoaTd stt; ;trtoq 8tT ps eq ez1s ut sasoBd noj iq seoBd xts IV;U9M; SBM TT pwr -/007 5t(B TjTaom SBM pUB1 JO eoeTd sTill um o; PusT jo uot;.xo;se 0114. JOJ PuTus BBM 811 pIBS UB118ddB etc; 631d etq. UI 'ITB;eP ewos Ut t O. X9JCJ PTUOM I Put PuTTO 1 191100 St eoUeptAe ettiL • .JnoO sTqT a; UT1B9ddB MOU St eq 'SOI eq lBeddB UO '1 SSeOOTS SBM UB118ddB etr; ';Jnoo JVtB jo eoeTd B xeao e;ndstp B st sii.j rov 6I_rr ioanr SO U I • S SO ••••••••• 0 ° •LctNOdU LMVItHO NOic.tI'Ii BA ' 0 ° ° ' ° ' . ° . ° ° ° ° 0 tL1'iV'1'1ddV VXNIZVN V'Ifl'IVDIVX I VPUSRN of e.ioje 69/t791 • ot[ 9SB3 It3 o.XTUBMPN • 0d oL61 JO 69 °N IBeddy 1T-T3 Ut uqoNng Tv qo JO Tjvtoo ;etI;sta tfl. J uotsioep et; wox) oL6i jo 611 O1I IVddV UAID (od) 1IZNVMN iLY VINVZffViL dO iLHflOO HDIH HiLtI -2-- And on appea1 the District magistrate and the assessors who sat with him, visited the disputed shamba again. They found that Alphonoe was not present when dispute which drose between Andrea, the original owner, and the respo: ent, and that Edward with Anatori fixed the subsequent boundary. I think the decision of the District Court is sound., It is not in dispute hat there was this arbitration which must have fixed the boundary fihally. It may well be there was a prior boundary when Andrea occupied the land before the appellant came into possession, but this boundary app ars to have been set aside and a new boundary was fixed as arbitrated. It appears that nobody challenged the decision of the arbitration and therefore that decision stands. The learned magistrate did cause the "milamula" to be planted after his decision, and the appellant is complaining against this. I see no justification 1 for this complaint bccause the plants were planted along the arbitrated boundary. I am sati fied that he had sufficient reasons for reversing the decision of the }rimary Court which, in my view, misconstrued the fac.t nd failed to directits mind on the issues of arbitrated boundary. It appears that the app1lant found the respondent already in that area since it is said that he bought the disputed piece of land from Andrea Kawamara, who was not called to give evidence. The appellant also complained that the ppellat magistrate did not take the evidence of Alphonce and Andrea Kawamara when he vis ted the scene; nor did he enquire from the villagers whohad gathered on the day he visited the disputed shamba. As far the former part, he already had the evidence of Aiphonce which he carefully considered, but there was no application made by the appellant to call AnLeA Kawamara, who apparently, coild not give evidence during the trial because he could not be traced, to give further evidence subsequoutly. As for the later part, the appellate magistrate was not upposed to make random enquiries from observers as this would not be a proper procedure. In the result, I find the decision of the District Court is fully justified. Order:- Aippeal dismissed with costs fixed at shs. 150/-. / 0. ? MWANZAO (Z.N. El-Kindy) 11.1.71 AG. JUDGE..