19710611 TZHC Arusha
. . . . . . 7- • 0po3 ICUOd Et- JO t71T itoes xepuD inoo jo qdwouoo qr postiooe otAu)oI :JOp.IO • wow- edrx AToCxo etj put2 Sp.xoM sp qoode.i oq. enooC pes •eaou11UC ssruq.tM IcW POCtI !1OU pop i q ueAt5 eq quowprC w qjq. A.xd I tOO et, ut eouepi;uoo CACtI op i Tnq noA ut eouepijuoo OU CACT I :pesnoo —:SpeeJ pooex...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19710611 TZHC Arusha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 1971
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
. . . . . . 7- • 0po3 ICUOd Et- JO t71T itoes xepuD inoo jo qdwouoo qr postiooe otAu)oI :JOp.IO • wow- edrx AToCxo etj put2 Sp.xoM sp qoode.i oq. enooC pes •eaou11UC ssruq.tM IcW POCtI !1OU pop i q ueAt5 eq quowprC w qjq. A.xd I tOO et, ut eouepi;uoo CACtI op i Tnq noA ut eouepijuoo OU CACT I :pesnoo —:SpeeJ pooex eTjj .U0pOtAU00 et oddns o. eOuCptAe Cu SCM ajaiTT qTlq CeddC ou pp C}J •inoo jo Tdw —ouog Ioj peoTAuoo sum queeddC et. TetTT p000 -,) 7T uo ecId'e Tj peuTCep TTnJMCI OSTMJ0114.0 peCeoJ E).Ctpewwr eq qtr2IoddC et epo .puC —oques PUP UOtqOtAUOO oqq. tsetib ICCddC Ctfl. t4OIIC TSnw I uoseeJ Stt. JO oq. CSCO ou sum e.xet •xei ooq. JtJ SeK uotnoosocT et t qStqCse o. OOtXetAC CU SCM DJOtTT pUC wtti[o SttTeAoJcT OT TUP-UTuTdwoo etfl. xoj •uCutCIcIwoo ei Pun luuTTOddu ei. q dTtTsJeuMo jo wto t eoueçAè a 7qq. jo OCJ OTTT uo SCM eeq. TPtjT SrM uotqtsod e WtuC ut'io STq pros P IT OtT cotlod aqq. poq. TuT3TT0c.fdu et pewtio uCutu1dwoo ;Fqq. Ouo OWCS e St TT puC uopsenb ut Snp oqj. uo TTnq C pros TUPTTedde e ITT T -,-- qT eso uottoeoid et. jo xecT SCM POOTTC SCM STfl UCAC TOU Tvq TT RjTquE?pT VqCuoSCeJ prioo etj qt pessessod -,)tT ewi. jo et. jo esrveoeq TvITT eq wTI nq eT4q. petJtuept OIT JOUUCW TuTJM Ut As qou pip .uCUC1dwOO OtTJ 'uot.scnb ut O4C9 Ot{. jo uotCoiJiquept queto'çJjns ou SCM e.xet •stt twed ouTTTm tott CSCO suotnoosod OTTq. UtMwJ C St exotj. Tnq eoisnC JO TSIJDqUT OqT Ut ICtJe.X C J8PJO PTI1 O -qS I J,1T4T0ITm POIOP —tsuoo OACtT I Puu SSOUqTM ICtA C SCM JeSCTOJDd -,)Tjj, sOOUCq.swT101to aTTT TIC JO JTT oi. ut TtI2,191A sqç 2uTsseCso JO Sjuo JOTT-ew u SCM TT Pun eqtSSiwpe TTCOI SCM OCUOpTAC Sill Jt1OO OtJ. CACCI O. pE4sOflbOJ SCM OSCO STtT Ut SSCUIM -,)'qT TUITT OOUOptAo OU SCM OJO J OUCtUOAUOO JO J4CW C SC T 1T euotto Tou pploo OtT PUC JOOUC PICOtT OuTAeq sitT sq POOUOTtIJUT eq OUpIOM icuowtseq. SSOT4qtM euo qtj. ut peestutwpu ciedoid eq o. si 00 1qSnC JT ttqCSApC STT COS UCO euo PUIP stTTq. oxtube.i o. eotoCJd TCJOUO ' T TI 0 00110PtA0 "UTATP O.IC SJCIO OttM Tinoo JO Ino eq Tsrw OS'30 o uT SOSSOU.tM VTJT SJCS tTOtT4M OJCMC we I SC ICJ SC 'MCI OU eJCT.1 UtJtSO. SCM UaUiCtdWoO —cOtlod Oi eTTM Jt1O0 Ut SCM @tT SC eoUeptAe Stt TTWPP oq pos —tJOJ OCJSCW TeTaT et. osneooq OouoptAo OAtS OU osntjoxtid etj, •*TdTooaj TvtTT UC ptCd Souow oq. peA -t000J OtM CUO Otfl. SC POST100C 0ITT peiyquopt )TJCTO CTJCW OL TCWIUC JCIflOtICd Otfl, POSetT9Xtld OtTM uosecT OTTT WOJJ dtooei C PCUTCO JOOTJJO ootId et 'nq Ot. pOZtS JOTfl. )UC cOtloci Otfl. 01, JO4CW ;-ITT peocTo ot tPOS ueoq UtACtT SC pOpUC..Iq TT MCS PIT peuItoX OtJ UM PTIC O)JJCW OI4CO C CUJOq O. Te TTrq STtT Tjol OtT TPITT POTIC TUPUTPTdwOO et • uoiotAuOo TSUTVPr TCBCC UC St STUJJ OOUOUOS UIOWTUtUJ OT4 UOAT2 PTtC .JOtfl. OT4C3 JO POTOTAU00 SCM UCITOdc1 C OtTJJ - opO3 ICUOJ Otfl. JO PTIC suoi.oes O. Aouoo Je1 T. O13V °WRD 00 0 ............. 00 0 ............. 3I'IIfld[e1 •HL St1SJCA aflOOV/LN'fTIIdd .................................. ...1OIVNKiNATIV OqCSt?CJf OtJSIa 'CtTSO 0 Nd oXOJOa firifigH Jiv IDIEWICE firTfIEW IO a,no3 Lonwrcr aIHIL io 6961 do 9171• OI atvD nIVMIIIll13 IVNIDflIO tL6i io • LoT °ON rIVlldV rIVNINIED NOIL3ItIHflf ILVTIaIddV irav Jk1 VINVZNL dO LHhlOO IIDIH RHI NI • • ',•• - 2 - Sentence: This sort of behaviour has been repeated by several accused and it cannot be let to continue. I sentence the accused to 8 months jail. All that occurred was that the accused was requesting a trial by another magistrate beOause he did not have Qonfidence in the one trying the case. He was within his rights and the learned magistrate should have considered thernatter according to law. It maybe that such an appbication could.not then be entertained but he had to rule on it. It is no contempt for a litigant to say that he had %o confidence in a court. Magistrates should be less sensitive and more impersonal in te adminstrdtion of the lw. Under tny powers of revision I will quash the convictipn for contempt and set ' aside the sentence. Delivered in Court at Arasha the day of June, 1971 (c.i. BRAMBLE) - J U D G E jsm