19710730 TZHC Arusha4

_z.x LUHIM COMMOF !1XJ AT,ARU RA crNr A9L W. 174 e 1971 1 7 AUG 1971 tG1AJ CRIMiNAL CA . .3242 0? 1970 O CT 0t iit)A DiTRiC T ifoe q., ftit Xar leiruytrate JCIUOt0LO 011109130 *., .. 'i uUh1C {AYWF 1e Otesling oontrary to mection 45, affi, the Ce Cap. 1 Vol. 1 of the ri. 2 B%trepary contrary to ction 294 (2) o the Penal Code jj Vol. 1 of tho La. BLE, J. — ppint wa4 ozwited on iwo cozLU of teiling cox &ry to ae*tion 265 and Baxglary oy to &uttcn 294 (2) of the Pria1 Code. He we sctenaod to ox montlis amt two yra rit with the Otalatory otrokes aral, hae appeal4d ?%gatnlst Ction .uui eztnco 4n rh Llant en4 the complainant 1tret tosethor In tM ume hoasw tlho oomplatinuast a11ooi that on the icrninr of tho 30th ?overtber 1970 he woke apt found the acourot gw nd motti, Q1othin and a table 4ioth ioain bn pe1nt was ariatt ac ta with a oc ConUirang nw 010the and a ta4olcth. The complainAnt ideatifiod the tasbiqcloth an ividne wa led that the apo1lant und oamplainant 01et ix t o oaa rooms that heftn,e going to bed the door and wthdows were bOltOd eid cxxi waking ap tka aomplAlnaat e the bodroon dOD OtL. 4flo ape4nt iove evidotce on oath M ien1ed that ie had telea anythi. I1 aaid that ho und the co1ainant Lived jji that thare 4as & diopute as to incaey speAt 04$ the comp1einznt 1ai his job and woo ordrøcL to vacated the remthco; that when the iag* p&bt to go to tobaa the Qnp inant aeked him aboat ioney but ho th%1 net tify "Utal that he lert the weziaee wtht oyth oo1b;e ao. wa latex' was, aoauuead of eto*ling 01othe0 d Th f atealing depanddd on the finding of tho faot by the trial .me tre it( he save aeveral reasof4v ihy he believed the comploinant, In particnalar the fiudin,& of the tb1i etoth whioh the nppoliaut did not refute. It may be that tia court wo1d have come to a diftrzit ooc1ttain but t is is no ground for roveraing in4 ir of the lowor oort. Tharo in avidenae to Support the oonviution for otealing and 11w senteiioe of 'xix nonto ioprizwnt is not xcoeeive. The opp6al in t4.a canre ic 3ec lion 294 (2) of iny poracn (2) havinS entered any bo.ilding, $j awed an a hwtn ilwellxng 4th intent to oit .a ?e101ay therein, or having committed a felony in any Wich bti1in&1 teflt Qr veet1, beake cut thereof- to gailty of the felony tor breaitn? ie 1ilo to tmpiiooniiant for aeven. yeer. The effenac to bur1ary if it toca place at night.. in the intnt thM the btLLdin, a a p1oa where the appellant had the right to o in and eote out. t do not think that it wksthe ixton1ion of the 1eie1aturo to itake atealing in ono'c on borae a more aeriotin offendo 2 than more utein. Bridn jj the key word and o p ers on doom not brek hio own øorrowt'tng Rbglinh iøtton tin1er the o1 Law rofcrd to he b øk&n øut of the dwe11i houae Of another atter aoimmitoting# a felony, This ww not as exact as it hon1d be beaauae I do not think that it tho1u4e1 tho cane whero an aoce was 1afLLl17 in the hoe and com4tted a feloni 4htiø tha. The ¶in,ft ot 19 6 8, Ln t1and 3ietablo o1aifid th(i pozition# 300ti•on ;xxt 9 povitea tht•a pernon ia gut1iy of burglarl ifs- (8) he ntore any buildin atroapaouer an1 with intont to cornti any such of.tence as is tc•ntioned in sabneation (2) b1ow or (b) having onterod any btidin oz part of a building tro sponaer he ateals Or stiampto to steal anything in tho baildina or that part o it or infUcto or atteffiptt to in11it on any parson i eroii ny Oreviotte bodily hnrn. !lhile atelion, 9 (b) doon not inolude the idea of breacng Out te zin e.oncopt ie that a ureon m=t ho a trenpsner and he auat ooit or attpt to ooimLi a partitWr type of ofenoe bet oro he can be convicted of bg1aty. In intarprotina section 294 of the VonI Code 1 am not prepred to held that a pe?&on enterine or hwLnij his OA hOUse 7 by nnbo 'dinZ a d or or otberwieo oan be raid to 0boak for the pArpoeeo of the section, In ordr to prove hurIary the unry into the pt3rtiou1ar building murt ka a1loi the n peal on the count for barglary# quash the oQ!woticn nm ut eoO the aooteiwei, The appellant ii11 havo a1ra43 eervd the tix monthe tmprieonmtt for stealina and I order that he be iediate1y raiaaned nalaso ot1wrwi*e lawfelly 'tained., eltvered in Court at Arsha the 30th dty of 3al, 1971. A1fl3L) 1lea // •