19710813 TZHC Arusha
-- • flIOII CGiBr GD TAICAUXA AT MUMS- A JMI £flThL N04 171 OF 1971 C/F C. •P 172 6 173/71 0tXiTWi ORINIVAL CA iC 19 1971 TtGr OGURT UY ?ARE DIPWR ICT AT jAMM- Beftre ..H. caiati Rbq, IIAOISTR ATS IM"R EDI J0 MAJ4L .• a è a itWi!* UM4fl1 .XSA /o 5 VGtEiu Trum REFUiLI( ...-..... .. o.... .e a ,,a*i.i , ,.a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19710813 TZHC Arusha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 1971
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
-- • flIOII CGiBr GD TAICAUXA AT MUMS- A JMI £flThL N04 171 OF 1971 C/F C. •P 172 6 173/71 0tXiTWi ORINIVAL CA iC 19 1971 TtGr OGURT UY ?ARE DIPWR ICT AT jAMM- Beftre ..H. caiati Rbq, IIAOISTR ATS IM"R EDI J0 MAJ4L .• a è a itWi!* UM4fl1 .XSA /o 5 VGtEiu Trum REFUiLI( ...-..... .. o.... .e a ,,a*i.i , ,.a ..YOt/RPO GBARGM ti1t cvsing a6tual bdi1y, .hrm cóntrery to ceation 241 of the Penal Cb.o (kp. 116 Vol. 1 of the Lews, R!1LTh. — The th'ee appe1lantt we* chrged joinfly with two others With Mlt camaing actual hodi1' hrrn o They were all a1mv ieted win. fiAed Glm. 40/— in dfau1t 3 man the iA prizonmoluto he copinant and one tnei gave the deteilex of the misault by eaoh a',,peI'Iant# PW 3, who is the op1ainnt's wife, ei8 that ohn Jed to run awkir fr-6m him and he wat h1d by some peop10 The e81oe1 rport chowed that t1e oop1thant had imvaral briiieee and abra i on The appellantj 1aodt Xddi, Ierit attooking the ocamplainint bt i4 that *he .80013 va invo1ed in n i ideni tilth app1it o. 2 Xeoei lie iit t4 not ee hint oofmittinI the ofenoe ie aLjeth Appe12Lmt wtu preI3e2lt at the acene and took awai tik with which the compinnt we beating his wife and epnrted lthtir.4 he said that he did not be*t him - Appellant Re. 3 .aid that he w the camplainant being eeooried and ieard that he hnd bee ten hir. wite but the iappel.lant tid not interfere. - while te appellanta oalled ret witneee their, eidenOe ws not very poeitive.- They onid tbt they did not aée the aneftalt • and thin did not -prove tLt it had not ocartd. It is Olear that thete was an acau1t tren the madioal rejert. The Tinding or the tia1 gietrte cen be eupjorted and I ee no reapon to interfort with the c onviO ticit. . It apeere that it wae a festive ocoaoion and the eompininant in partcu1or wti ldrutik and 4id attok bin vifee While there May hae. been juatifioatiot. in eepertieg thepartieg there we none in ei1tLg the cornp1inent, The ijurion more very minor and hvthg regard to the general eetting I m of the opin&-oil that n fine Of he. 40Q/- wae gro1j ezcesaive. • will, tofote set avide t1e aettente , and a fine of 10/— in detu1t 2 months iprthontzent* To this ezient the tpptsis are s11owe1* he tbrd and Corth accuied d14 not ppea10 tinder *ny poworn of revic ion X sake the ee lordor as If the finee have already been pain the diffete7e iiat be refanded., e1ivarcd in Court at Ar&utha the 13th day of Atitiat, 1971 1iBL) j U Q