19721130 TZHC Mwanza
— " ccT:T . z. HI@ii COUI CLi:L P C'.C/72 (Oiji1 Cri;inj C So io. 434 of .971 o tiiio Dj -tjct Court of or: Dj.' - Bcforc: J.E. .uniroi, Ri1c:.: t,iztr - te). D1i1L 1aOIL. th*t, q,*'., •. • • eø.s (Olginni .iccj2) V 12,' TI' T TQ ,( TT(1 .1_I (OrigIncl 1?r012';onor). JiJ:Dc..EiTT Uff J.— TLio c ..iJ.:r ur rivcn in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19721130 TZHC Mwanza
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1972
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
— " ccT:T . z. HI@ii COUI CLi:L P C'.C/72 (Oiji1 Cri;inj C So io. 434 of .971 o tiiio Dj -tjct Court of or: Dj.' - Bcforc: J.E. .uniroi, Ri1c:.: t,iztr - te). D1i1L 1aOIL. th*t, q,*'., •. • • eø.s (Olginni .iccj2) V 12,' TI' T TQ ,( TT(1 .1_I (OrigIncl 1?r012';onor). JiJ:Dc..EiTT Uff J.— TLio c ..iJ.:r ur rivcn in ic Scurity Dc. :n;:...n, i2.nc. ion.. Ho. t tho :'... ninJ tir:.. t::norri1y st icn i v;rs cdl.ci no c. witn.s i:i .: crininni cno . Tfin. F. ''.:s fon i1y of 0; 2.ininr by f12.150 prc.toccs nn scnt •:coC. n' inprisorijc.nt for nontho. His o:)p012J- is oins tho con'icicn o sorrtcnco. A -t Hn ri121 Hr. H:;cnb for hiLl. 0 conduci :io .n'1 was i'ir., Tu'.ai. iiclp no souJ.t bT I;.r., LIna:. o inforniod H.i Court 1nt fc.lt :::sonnlly iiwolvc.d in the. :i1'.ttcr, f o r ru;soio which '.i..1 b. ovicHn'rt in thc ccurc,o of thic fin'. 1n'rnc.d trinl o.hicr tc. nnr].vc.n'd t videL:ccj On rc.cord. ru C22L to tin', conclusion tirt it n:'. truc tho o o1J. :: cln±i.iud c11oinrcs f.:r :cr. niGHts, ond nt :1 hihcr r.'.to thc.r. in'; - .ct"J.l .:ntiticd to, of rn lody prc:.hirç hi.nsoJi to 'cc ni drlini:t:cctivo o:Hiic.r Iron Bukoba, cn6t1 c. 'GO bo :id nt shs 25/.- 2 or niht Ion the tostiniony on r cord it is viI .t -Hnt thu effhvc ca prct:;nco, if ti:orc woo onc, is the one tIn to Pw.3, Go:D:.Hlrf th ci crk ot tho Ronidc I:.str tn s Court, Torinc, who H d tT.c duty of :.71n2 court witnesses. Thn.t :.w.i GOOJo'1h11 :::chcis3o, -ti Rjd Cot n-co on cc.osuJn'incc frora SLc; •tht thc. ; .11n:.t woo indoed on Acbini. Grntivu Of fi cur nd on tho strcnc;th of th t Horooso oi,"rc d th Poynunt Voucln'r TH0 c?121 1 Oflt told th_ triri court Hn ri.: t ho told thu clurk .:nc tint H- .. crivur, clninin', for only thr :.iHts, nt shs. 15/— cr iuiCht. If tiiot v:30 so i-nj should L1.T.V2 JO .11 slGXPriEC :.c sknd Hcsuu w1u onc.. 175/- .VOS shorn on thu vouchr -nd I do not find n-t Hcrsuc.sive his ilc.i:in tini: tn .t nm hc Cot hone cftur hod bc. .n pr Id. H ony ct the Intcrn-1 Pv .nuc Offic: ho thought thu cxc so woo for t. . otlior cincys ho hod or uorlifr oCCoSions ond ;Yj.i0120 nunbur H'u H.d und;crtnkon to chcc: in the cosc fili There- is SOflcn'1I fishy in thu o)puiJr-:nt' s version, but t is not nucnoznxily to soy th-t thu dLgcd I'o10 r:nHn'nco nos provud bcyord rosonoblo doubt. hr. Mntc.nbo, le:rnod vocuto nt th irid eicgorod the Prosocution quitc vdidly thur he took Licoru on on tho cu ution of poyronts nod... to otliur 'atn:nsos, in p:rticul: r to Adclox c.nd. t' ore Llui.lipo Hoso busincsun.- -n, on thu sr;uu doy tia nppnll.-.rt. Tho point "ins roisud. *11 tHe- - Iconiorc:nd.un of oppeol i - s will 5 by hr. Ti.duurobo ot the 1.:ii ng of H ti nrC qui.to rightly iii ny flon, Thu Looccutior told th court triol toi0t tIDc Poyiuort Vouchurs for - ti uso o t h r pn::uiDtu \orc tang, which no curiouu, i-uid it should not hovc. Lc.c.n inposuiblc to locrtc. C. 1ucst urL COPiLS at tIi Luternol RcvurDno Oificc. Philipo Lio,-_ '. c: iculorly vu- s p:icL :.e ncch i-iS ii12. 41Z/-. oven thou:hlcc woo c Duf.;nc':. nit: r, nrC ui-ns:u cncu:IH I Iiov: corked os Court rk sircu 1964 but t.:. .n' th first tiun- Icr no to se-c 1'nuc: \:itn0512 pr -.id. olicvicncu'. TIc: forcoiugandtIu fret tIc 1 U n'L Iflc to s :is y Ini,i2 bj c ioc 1ti r...corc's th'-t i the- nc oli:-nt i-iGtEnCc.d on no Clot. ; ut dot ... t. :n' .vlOus J. nuory, cn'd in cry opinion cost n cloud of doubt on LIc.sou'. V. riccity. I notice, funHoor, the- ccnccliod IHY Bukobou on bcth C :0-cc: of the Pryirunt VO/C:, i: ink, ord r. Son.. 'ii.: 1. :trncc. is Hc. t r:tii the tine t1101r ;':.rccl - -.- - cor..iprny with ;n. 'ri L inr1 cc , irs not on origi22cl 5 i-rid honcc it is not urn.00ai; blo to ooinc. .ht it is possible 1 u.hob vir.s not ,.on the vouchor v;lien oroso si'ncd it, or fer tnG i.c1usioniou1d hivo- ott:: c1 too ;ench t .:vn a'oei hr. Korosso no •.recnnuly 1aow tho ipp11nt. TIIO .nsu L1JiTt h.v: .:cod in collusion with the apo11ent e. su,ntion ..ot so wild, considn;'; eli the circunstecr:, There was i -ri ny, oCinjon r.:on - i1c doubt as to .hotho:c ri o:u prc?errd tile pay- newt voucher for hs. 175/— r ci1y bc..use of fi-lse pr enc.e by the appelirrit. I rcspoctfuiLy, wi -tb . - jobe. tht tho nat er should have ectivoly e e d trio su.nd of tre isn..: 1. ar5istrsto. I quash ti CO1WiCtio:l set asiCc tne F4Uflt.:flCC. 12hie appoliclTt is not in.rw.d en sccou:-rt 'f ny. other lawful n - i er :::houlci forthwith bi roleased. The dif::a wee bct':csw he'. nern thi. rppc1leiat not .-ai1..h t he egress he was entitled to is shs. 1301—, Lo 115 has elrL. dy peid. beck shs 70/—. he should now rob.i.wd tb oth.;r she. 601— to th Resident :: j : -rr. te?s Court, Txinc. oth lonecc ccuns1 f o r the - nilant conplai...ccr.: tnt tho to-nor an d tOne of trio 3Ueon.:i1i . w. seid tho-t the J ernri trial nastrcto dcscrid.cd to -u"Jo level of 'e::so:r 1 attack on Mr. 11 :. . n. 1 r. ITtabaye, t 1crncd St: to Attorrty cowce.i is 1. hi1c I do not .,ith Liz. itatcaba :.:'.. -. that the ap:ollaut suffered ro- a r.,uli of th•dust of c.e.fheot between the Bench rind thac lar, for I en se ;i.:iLd th, - t the trial i.:nr, t . re chci his unsound dcciion inIcpo:edcnt1 - ..d' .:i.e attitude towards ....r. 11. toriba' S psrfornia.rco, I agree thet the 1 cc einieh.. is' :. asides wore uiec.el'....C: for, end as Mr. Mtebaye put it iie bd i sto. he: learned R;ridnet i ate ra - dc it quito clear th.:.t hr. Lh-icsiba. was di:bonc:ily r.isloeingt3ae sourt arid couching his client to toll lies. Aiiiong say" a:. 3. ..thsr piecco- the :.a : inhe is observed 'idrb i1Itcrib deliberately i con1'use P?.3 Li a: ri ettanet to divert tho- course of justico. I J :.aa:cc en a nunoer of 0cc, crows but,..tne learned lawyer clrd.nod 'heat ho vao ccii:: wader instructions cf ::.i.s ciien. Then in a strenge an:logy he aj leube. we s like a decert in.haiitan,t with a 'rory short piece of rep..., wio :r. I soly held out bo:' a stranor who had fallen intde deep doep i' in the desert. For just i-n erso Mr. Matonba v.'cs in any doubt., the goodue,,istr. h sn(.ud with "Thc advocate- in tbi case (Mr. lihe her-) c:'itor,iptud to use nil trjc1s to isapress his Quito seriously, this is urtubing, conir fron 'he. b.:wch as it doce. I can quite o-eiiafiod that there 'as no log-itiriate cnasa for lashing the 1 iocrncd Advocate cc hard. In amp C: so with wore eo.;::i'inac. I hope the learned trial raagistr. - tc v/ill learn tint i± in must hit nt ho C.:: do so with satin glove-s. ]ofcssioa1 advocacy is p' rt Of our judicial apetow arid corel should b.: allowed to havu ned neoy abe noiets1 tranquility nceenary for adequately advocating for their clients. I hope tb.. :'ooing cettlos the ratter and that le - rnrid counsel .dll regard it as closed. If it is any consolation to tbei., no doubt thep will d.so have notd hni in the cauzso- of the sane judgssie:-rt the learn ,d. trial wagstrate obscrv d th:t a fellow R side-nt Mec.stratc had acted uwiwtcllig'ently", when he could just as effectively aa .ployccl a wore noun' 1 - sounding exprocsin..:a. (uito often bluntness and lack of tact do not na-mate fra a cIlc:ir' to le doliberately JJDOiJ BUKOBA: i:Tov,,nher, 30th, 1972.