19720317 TZHC Arusha
jA o o flJX0fl GCIUT-JOL 4!LA PJAT DflC}4 1$ C U CPI$ZL PPA 28 of 1912 OIGflM4 cXL CrZ 4c. 796 rm DirMICT CUT4? Cr KILIKATUA00 zxcw AT eThre 3 • 1!.C. iinaM------ ReLdent itrt ubr /o 36lrn AppeUrit (Orgthal t&ocuae1) IThL Rzkslac (Origta1 Proeotor) 1Gt Cooni SJop Ire kir o/ 296(1) Cap. 16. tnt St.althg ole 265 of,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19720317 TZHC Arusha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1972
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
jA o o flJX0fl GCIUT-JOL 4!LA PJAT DflC}4 1$ C U CPI$ZL PPA 28 of 1912 OIGflM4 cXL CrZ 4c. 796 rm DirMICT CUT4? Cr KILIKATUA00 zxcw AT eThre 3 • 1!.C. iinaM------ ReLdent itrt ubr /o 36lrn AppeUrit (Orgthal t&ocuae1) IThL Rzkslac (Origta1 Proeotor) 1Gt Cooni SJop Ire kir o/ 296(1) Cap. 16. tnt St.althg ole 265 of, ee1 Ooe Cp. 16. Eta A.J. Appe11ant is coAvict4 of 1 6hok b kiz'nd tstoallngO fe 296 (1) .and 265 of •Cp. 16 of the 1e and is ttenaed to 9 years impreonrnet and 24 at-rokae of corporl panIhiot, snd it ordered that efteV ge rVIA S eewtenoe ho sh oid utkdorgo p1$.ce ov pervision, . for two yeareo fle now apt1t ** &e t c onviG t&o end uettoftee* In his xem6rauduA of aPpeal the a1unt •ssys eiece :Wall not •OUEh to prove bie gmilt oo1ive1y for the oftenoee with ich he wns ebared with ent trisi mogistrau did not wdigh the evidenoe proper1y. Ott of naty, thinga atolen only to tine & oil Wart foand iti poeion OP the ape13nt and were oorrectIi i4en-tified as thooe oh were sto1a. Leorned Stato Attortay Stated that the fects and ev4•cnos are imcfe ppropristo to prove the offenoe of , civng atol,en ,propertyunder section 311(1) of Potial Code andthe Court hon1d eabstitate the oonviCticn toe ord i ngLi. It ja true that cut tf M&ny tterne stolen cn tin of o• m found with tho uppollanto EVen etter applying the trthO of recent poesaeion it wo.ld be £norract to e&g thet it was tns eppi1snt who broke the s1op in queetion and atole from tber*in. It would to more corec't to tay thot he reoeived. the tin in, questitn knowing thet it wee etaen or un1sfuLly obtained. There is ooLgh evideno to prove and •atablieh thie. Accor4itg1y the conviction to cpIUn nd atealing le eet aside end, L ebtitted for the oftenoe of eceivin g stolen prper1ty' c/n 311(1) lof Penal Code* Ara for sentence th* tern or imp?tsnent of 2 leers ta the luiuimue lanIsr the law. Bte ordr for police ampsirviaLoA for 2 ytartj is not correct to it oen. 1ycrdeDed where a Pontando of three years iaprisonmet o' pwerde is orderedo tacordingly thie order i not correct avid. is set seide. Pete]., *g. Tud(Ø. 1.5/3/12 Appea1 is dismiabod except for the eended orders at to oonviotion and nentnceo Delivered, in Court on 17th Xorcht 1972 in preeence of state Attorna* iP Putel, iirne thi.