19720519 TZHC Arusha

! 4- at MG9 cooar o TrM:.A 4 4 PELLATH JMIWICTUON. RIGH COUIRT CRIMPW4 AWAL NO.60 OP 1072. RflM CASR M. 9W OP 191. OF 2B GOUIEI OP LcYIHA DXiUC? A M, St P. A. WVJ DIM TOT MISMTS ) 4 4 4 4. 4 4 4 41 4 4 4 4 • * 4 4 * # 4 4 4 4 S 44 * 4 * AZ2I Wo AMIA 1CINtL MZUG) VMSUS S! flL1C: (OAt WARM ftore b tM ø/ 296(L) 4n& 260 of the P. Code, The two pp •*uit ppceok Ainet flflCtozL tor itore bret*in *ntl tU&g cug to txs .,64 (1) and 285 of the ?en1 CoO.e we 8 teeo oo yeor rtoonmont tith the ath1ut The co•c for the pr000cuton woz that thiijr be of cert were fourul misains from atoz'o oo the 1oor of vhtoh look4 the &W before but vo avcLrde found 1wo)on, PJ2 atated that HWUi o/O ppeUAnt 0041 a8ked hiiu vtother he as wMins to Join in ntealin eomerit wA toM hin that he had to1en ti'ty baa from the 8tore of the Wnga PrImW School eM toother ith appe11tnt flo* 2 hiL e1d it for a 1ot of money. P.T. , Oho we tho owtor of e notcr Vthtclo toat.fied that both appollants hr*4 his vohLo10 to transport tè1vo bøic of oeflo* front Pluo near the tuaw ap P Liiety Sohool - to Muhana, P.W. 4 ew ihei tbo cencrit was oae on the ve21e. Doh eppellanto gave uor'n statements to to effect that th nothing &bøut the mattc. Ze ox4y point of ariy eubtence that was ralatA in the PctitMn of Ippe1 o that the theft wao not r"rted to thø pOlice as soon as it wte dizooverad but bray v&orxP.W. 2 gwo wormtion about it • Ibis was not t4t4L to the eao. Apart frm the oontesion of appellant No. I to PJ tbe ias the atrono Ovidenco of P,W.6 00nnMtins the appellenta tiltb the offence, the 12nc1 tria1 magiatrato believod theee witnesses and there is no xaeOn to say that ho i'u wrong. The oowictioni are baee& on *k*xfk the firng of f&ta and the is az1e evidence in support. I uphoM the eonviotions. The sentence in each caae is the vinimm proncr*.bed by , law. Xhe appeals are dinissed in their Ontxet D1tvre4 in Cowt at rm the 19th day of May, 1972. E. 3LE) am-