19721006 TZHC Arusha
py £' JZA ! IN ThL1a108 OcimT OV TAIMAXIAA APPELLAT- 9JUaX$DICU ON - -. fl1O1 COURVI OR11N A'L 14C. 218 of 1912 c/p N o. 219 of 1972 ORII1ML CRthItL CASE flO* 16 of 1972 OF THE DITMT CGU4 OP P1,111JU DiJT fore C.j. Astmati ---•---------- District Magi s trate BALI z/c SAID ------------- - Appellants C4ARI S/C BiD...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19721006 TZHC Arusha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 1972
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
py £' JZA ! IN ThL1a108 OcimT OV TAIMAXIAA APPELLAT- 9JUaX$DICU ON - -. fl1O1 COURVI OR11N A'L 14C. 218 of 1912 c/p N o. 219 of 1972 ORII1ML CRthItL CASE flO* 16 of 1972 OF THE DITMT CGU4 OP P1,111JU DiJT fore C.j. Astmati ---•---------- District Magi s trate BALI z/c SAID ------------- - Appellants C4ARI S/C BiD (Originai Accuee) flLI1PUL10 ------------- ------------ Rponcteni (r&n&1 Pros.) CMW Steeling /a 26 of the Peta1 Code. Cap. 16. Vol. 1 of the Le.. Bremble, 3o he ftso appellants were oonvicAed of stealing cntrary to eokLon 265 of the Feiial Code and centenced to 15 m onths imPrisonments rhese are appe1s aainet cnviotion and nentenceo he pro tion,allegad that the conp1 raM lost 35 fiOng nets on the 24th KaY# 1972. The complainant said that he found thr*e nets in the houee or the first eppollant and three in that of the seond* fle had initisle N&A and 4J.t3 on them ad they wert the tutiale or hin fthsr Mayak4eZo and his wife 4xy•. He admtttø 1 that A cot1i repreent any nane, 4 11 . he *ppe11nts sheald not have been chered oint1y since the nets we re no feund in their joint ession. he c1ame1 thvt the hats beng** to tbo. Ths oompenent did not previously gave any of i8øntieUon on the nets be missed and it is strangre that he did not tjnd any whioh had his initials. Apert from the iñiaL on the ouoyia there were no other raria of id entificatJon. since all that the oiainant cotid say was that the first letter was the sage as the first initial of bis f ther and his wife there wee no proper tdentttiattcn. or these vs irns I etant e1*w the ap9e1s, quach the niotion and sentence in each cane And osr tb t the appe11nta be inediete1y reteanod zni.su they are otherwius 1aful1y detainee. Delivered in cturt et troaM the 6th day of Octoor, 1972. (o.L Bram1e,) JU_DG E. I imathi